[MapServer-users] Speed of WMS vs Speed of WCS; How to speed up WCS service?

Marcin Niemyjski mniemyjski at cloudferro.com
Thu Jul 27 02:26:25 PDT 2023


Hello Jukka,

Yup I guess that's the case, I assumed that WCS has the same capabilities as WMS when it comes to handling time dimension and it would use the default time from mapfile while requesting the data.
This is my mapserv log file from one getCoverage request (very small, that's why It took only 30 sec to process it). It would be great if you check it 🙂:
https://s3.waw3-1.cloudferro.com/swift/v1/Julien/log2.txt

as you can see mapserver lists all of tile item objects (or at least I guess it does haha) which intersect with requested BBOX. So, this is the problem, that's why it takes so long to generate file. I've got to pass somehow time parameter to request, or at least to query(?) to reduce number of returning shapes.

You mentioned your own supporting time WCS service, is it open source? If not, can you give me advice on how to start writing my own? Just some basics ^^

Thanks for your complex answer it helped a lot,
Marcin






________________________________
From: Rahkonen Jukka <jukka.rahkonen at maanmittauslaitos.fi>
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2023 12:05 AM
To: Marcin Niemyjski <mniemyjski at cloudferro.com>; MapServer Users <mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org>
Subject: Re: [MapServer-users] Speed of WMS vs Speed of WCS; How to speed up WCS service?


Hi,



Does the tileindex query ” DATA 'geometry from (select * from plua order by "maxCC" desc) “ return several images from the requested BBOX?



I know that MapServer WCS can be fast and we have also a demo at https://beta-karttakuva.maanmittauslaitos.fi/demo/ortokuvat_ja_korkeusmallit/#15.05/67.01553/27.16873

but unfortunately the user interface is only in Finnish. The source images (maybe 10 TB or so) are GeoTIFFs and they are not in the cloud. The time for downloading a small GetCoverage response as GeoTIFF seems to take around 400 milliseconds. We had to write a small service that makes our WCS service to support time as a dimension because MapServer does not support it with WCS https://www.mail-archive.com/mapserver-users@lists.osgeo.org/msg26265.html.



-Jukka Rahkonen-





Lähettäjä: MapServer-users <mapserver-users-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> Puolesta Marcin Niemyjski via MapServer-users
Lähetetty: keskiviikko 26. heinäkuuta 2023 15.06
Vastaanottaja: MapServer Users <mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org>
Aihe: Re: [MapServer-users] Speed of WMS vs Speed of WCS; How to speed up WCS service?



Hi Seth,



as you suggested, I've added the Extent parameter to all of my layers, and it resulted in decreasing time to 5m33.534s. But still, it's quite a lot of time for generating 1.5 MiB file.



Any other suggestions?
Maybe there is something wrong with projection so beyond just serving data mapserver have to reproject it multiple times? (more than one time by using tilesrs option)?



Thanks,

Marcin



________________________________

From: Seth G <sethg at geographika.co.uk<mailto:sethg at geographika.co.uk>>
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2023 12:58 PM
To: Marcin Niemyjski <mniemyjski at cloudferro.com<mailto:mniemyjski at cloudferro.com>>; MapServer Users <mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:mapserver-users at lists.osgeo.org>>
Subject: Re: [MapServer-users] Speed of WMS vs Speed of WCS; How to speed up WCS service?



Hi Marcin,



As a first test I'd recommend adding in EXTENTs to all your layers (and ensuring they are correct):



EXTENT 1334552.857598 5342648.587634 4715044.821842 7547620.486088



If these are missing MapServer will often try and calculate these from the datasource automatically. Depending on the request type this calculation could be made multiple times.



Seth



--

web:https://geographika.net<https://geographika.net/> & https://mapserverstudio.net<https://mapserverstudio.net/>

twitter: @geographika



On Wed, Jul 26, 2023, at 11:53 AM, Marcin Niemyjski via MapServer-users wrote:

Hello,



I have a problem, Namely, I have created a WCS and here is its mapfile:

https://pastecode.io/s/6v3qfssb



For a better understanding, here is a view of the tileindex through which the data is served:

https://pasteboard.co/ydgvDiqxz4lf.png



I am connecting to files located in a private bucket, so I am using vsis3.



The WMS loads quite fast, but the issue arises with the time it takes to generate a requested WCS tile:

 https://pasteboard.co/8G8uF41jqgHc.png



It takes almost 5 minutes to generate the tile, and the received data is 1.5 MiB (which is it's actual size).



Additionally, I am sending you URLs to sample data:

https://s3.waw3-1.cloudferro.com/swift/v1/Julien/Data/T34UFD_20230708T093549_TCI_60m.jp2

https://s3.waw3-1.cloudferro.com/swift/v1/Julien/Data/T37TCN_20220605T083559_TCI_60m.jp2



The case is - how to speed it up? Am I making any goofy mistakes?

I would be grateful for any recommendations or if you notice any errors, I might be making :)



Best,

Marcin

_______________________________________________

MapServer-users mailing list

MapServer-users at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:MapServer-users at lists.osgeo.org>

https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-users




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/mapserver-users/attachments/20230727/1bb0feac/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the MapServer-users mailing list