[Marketing] Question on Questions and a Question

[Jody Garnett]

I was going to add Q&A/Clarifications to the website page. I think you
already fielded some questions did you not Jeff?

--
Jody Garnett

On 18 January 2017 at 11:22, Jeffrey Johnson <ortelius at gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 on all these. It may be a bit much to ask folks to subscribe to our
> list, does it allow through public posts, or could we moderate those
> through and respond cc'ng the original person but keeping the response
> on the list? Wiki is a great idea too.
>
> I concur that the project management overhead on our side is probably
> not worth it, lets see what kind of questions/responses we get.
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Cameron Shorter
> <cameron.shorter at gmail.com> wrote:
> > If we decide to answer questions publicly (which I think we should),
> then I
> > also suggest that we encourage vendors to send questions to this public
> > marketing email list.
> >
> > Re question about breaking project up, I'd suggest we aim to minimise
> OSGeo
> > volunteer workload and risk by encouraging bidders to team up under one
> > prime rather than put in multiple bids for multiple components.
> >
> > Adding a wiki with questions and official responses is probably a good
> idea
> > too.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 18/01/2017 6:35 AM, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 17 January 2017 at 11:14, Jeffrey Johnson <ortelius at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> One question I have had already is how are we going to respond to
> >>>> questions from potential vendors. Should they send them to
> >>>> secretary at osgeo.org to be forwarded to us?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I assume so; you may wish to volunteer act as point for the EOI
> process.
> >>> If
> >>> I remember our meeting notes Marc and I are digging into
> policy/strategy
> >>> document.
> >>
> >> Im happy to be the POC, but I do NOT want people emailing me directly
> >> with these questions and prefer to answer them formally. Perhaps we
> >> ask the secretary to prepare any questions and send them to us and we
> >> can respond as a group formally and with a public record (even if I am
> >> taking the lead)
> >>
> >>>> The question at hand was whether we would consider splitting up the
> >>>> contract so that a firm was only proposing for one or two parts and we
> >>>> would have another vendor for the other component(s). I think this
> >>>> could be ok, but would require more project management on our side.
> >>>> Should we put language to this effect in the letter to discuss?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I see.
> >>>
> >>> The update to splitting out content migration is it could dovetail into
> >>> an
> >>> going editing role in 2018.
> >>>
> >>>> Really hoping we can get this out today, the clock is ticking :)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Can we send it, and answer questions as they come in. You can add Q&A
> to
> >>> the
> >>> http://www.osgeo.org/marketing/rebranding.html page.
> >>
> >> Marc, I'd prefer you send this to discuss as the chair of our committee.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Marketing mailing list
> >> Marketing at lists.osgeo.org
> >> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cameron Shorter
> > M +61 419 142 254
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Marketing mailing list
> > Marketing at lists.osgeo.org
> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
> _______________________________________________
> Marketing mailing list
> Marketing at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/marketing/attachments/20170118/84251668/attachment.html>