[MetaCRS] Trac / SVN Organization

[Hugues Wisniewski]

Hi all,

I also agree to all these items
A separate Trac system is good. The SVN structure looks good to me too
I don't know if this discussion will go very far, it feels like your proposal makes a lot of sense, I'd be tempted to call for the vote today.
Norm will be away for 2 days starting from tonight and he could vote today if that's possible
Thanks

Hugues

-----Original Message-----
From: metacrs-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:metacrs-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Mike Adair
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 12:30 PM
To: Frank Warmerdam (External)
Cc: metacrs at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [MetaCRS] Trac / SVN Organization

I agree it's probably more important to have separate Trac instances.
As long as each instance can point to it's own piece of the SVN tree it
should work.

I am all for getting this up and running as soon as possible.

Mike



Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> Folks,
>
> OK, we have a PSC so we can officially make decisions now!  The first
> thing
> I'd like to get in place is Trac and SVN for our subprojects.  I know
> that
> CSMAP is chomping at the bit to settle in.  PROJ.4 has been without a bug
> tracker for several months now, and Mike mentioned a home for proj4js
> when
> he sees me. :-)
>
> I've had a few discussions about the idea of a single join svn and trac
> instance for all the MetaCRS projects, and it seems like a non-starter.
> It is very difficult to manage per-project stuff in Trac (like release
> schedules, component lists, etc) if we have all the projects in one
> instance.
>
> For SVN it wouldn't be so bad to have everything in on SVN instance.  We
> could have one big instance, with top level directories for each of the
> projects - each with their own distinct /trunk /branches and /tags
> subtree.
> I believe we can have distinct trac instances then point into that.
> However, I'm not sure if doing this will introduce any additional
> problems
> or not.
>
> So, my preliminary proposal is that we request OSGeo to provide a Trac
> instance for CSMAP, PROJ.4, PROJ4JS and one joint Subversion instance
> for MetaCRS.
>
> We might also want a later Trac instance for MetaCRS itself, in which
> we could manage shared test cases, dictionaries and such.
>
> I'll open this for discussion now, and perhaps call for a vote tomorrow
> so we can get things moving.
>
> Best regards,
_______________________________________________
MetaCRS mailing list
MetaCRS at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/metacrs