[MetaCRS] OGC Dialects
Martin Desruisseaux
martin.desruisseaux at geomatys.fr
Wed Feb 16 14:15:32 EST 2011
Hello Howard
For information, the GeoTools/Geotoolkit.org dialect is actually the one
published on this web page (click on any projection, the parameter names are the
one published in the "OGC WKT" column):
http://www.remotesensing.org/geotiff/proj_list/
I would guess that GDAL uses the same codes, since this page is maintained (I
think) by Frank Warmerdam.
The parameter names are actually aready standardized (maybe not all of them, but
many of them). The authoritative document is there (click on "OpenGIS Coordinate
Transformation Service Implementation Specification"):
http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/ct
See especially the tables at page 30 and 35. The "removesensing.org" web page is
conformant with this specification as far as I know, but more complete.
An other possibility is to use EPSG names (the above page contains a ZIP file
mapping the EPSG name to OGC names). Note however that some EPSG parameter names
changed in the latest EPSG database release (7.6).
Regards,
Martin
Le 16/02/11 19:55, Howard Butler a écrit :
> All,
>
> I am working to write language to update the ASPRS LAS specification to move from using GeoTIFF keys as the only identifier of spatial reference information to the use of WKT in addition to GeoTIFF keys. One of the challenges of writing this language is that simply saying "Use OGC WKT" is not sufficient to promote interoperability between softwares expecting to utilize SRS information in LAS. The question is also about using *who's flavor* WKT. There seems to be many ways to say the same thing in the nodes of the WKT document. A quick list might include:
>
> * ESRI
> * GDAL/OGR/OSR
> * GeoTools
> * Oracle 9
> * Oracle 10
> * CSMap
>
> So, assuming your writing language to inform tomorrow's software developers about what to use, what would you tell them with regard to dialect?
>
> Howard
More information about the MetaCRS
mailing list