[MetaCRS] CS-MAP RFC #4

[Andre Barth]

+1 Andre

One additional comment though (in addition to what Hugues has said): Wouldn't we wanted to keep the 2008 project files anyway, i.e. in parallel?

We cannot assume anyone to use the new compiler + VC runtime in their custom project. In fact, we also haven't switched to the new runtime from day 0 on. It would be a true burden then to produce VC  9.0 output.

Anyways - either way is fine for me (i.e. keep the old project files in parallel or not to keep the maintenance effort low).

Thanks,
André

-----Original Message-----
From: metacrs-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:metacrs-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Norm Olsen
Sent: Montag, 21. März 2011 22:49
To: Hugues Wisniewski; Frank Warmerdam (External); metacrs at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: RE: [MetaCRS] CS-MAP RFC #4

+1 Norm

I expect to rename/relocate the solution/project files so that all will remain accessible.

Norm


-----Original Message-----
From: metacrs-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:metacrs-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Hugues Wisniewski
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 10:57 AM
To: Frank Warmerdam (External); metacrs at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: RE: [MetaCRS] CS-MAP RFC #4

+1 with one comment

Since CS-Map is statically linked to MapGuide and MapGuide is not ported yet to VS2010, I would keep around the current projects and solutions until the port occurs on their end too I haven't seen any announcement on the MG internals yet but I guess it should happen anytime soon

Thanks

Hugues

-----Original Message-----
From: metacrs-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:metacrs-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Frank Warmerdam
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 6:18 AM
To: metacrs at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [MetaCRS] CS-MAP RFC #4

On 11-03-16 07:12 PM, Norm Olsen wrote:
> Hello All . . .
>
> I have posted RFC #4 for CS-MAP. A simple upgrade to be compatible 
> with VS 2010. Virtually no code needs to be changed, but I will take 
> this RFC opportunity to remove all the warning messages at warning 
> level 3. The solution and project files need to be upgraded. I intend 
> to do this in a way such that the existing solution and project files will be preserved and remain usable.
>
> I'll probably have most all of this done by the time you see this 
> message, so a prompt response would be appreciated.

Norm,

I am +1 on:

   http://trac.osgeo.org/csmap/wiki/CsMapRfc4

BTW, I feel like this falls into the category normal maintenance that doesn't need a RFC though it is nice to peg a stake in the ground about building clean at /W3.

Best regards,
--
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------
---------------------------------------+------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | Geospatial Programmer for Rent

_______________________________________________
MetaCRS mailing list
MetaCRS at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/metacrs
_______________________________________________
MetaCRS mailing list
MetaCRS at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/metacrs
_______________________________________________
MetaCRS mailing list
MetaCRS at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/metacrs