[MetaCRS] Give Calvin Metcalf commit access to proj4js; proj4js review policy

[Calvin Metcalf]

We opened an issue for each of the original points and closed them as they
were solved.  Instead of closure we got it to work with uglify2.
On Sep 7, 2013 3:39 PM, "Michael Adair" <madair336 at gmail.com> wrote:

> I was going to ask if there was a list of the work to be done anywhere, or
> is it appropriate to just create issues in github?  For example I thought
> that getting Proj4js to compile with closure in advanced mode was a
> priority, is that still the case?
>
> Mike
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 3:40 AM, Andreas Hocevar <andreas.hocevar at gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Welcome Calvin, with four +1 votes and no objections you are now a
>> proj4js committer. Keep up the great work!
>>
>> With a vote of three +1, proj4js now has a review policy - no merging of
>> pull requests without a peer review.
>>
>> Thanks Hugues for the RFC suggestion. Although we do not have such a
>> process in place, I would ask everyone who has big changes in mind to
>> discuss them beforehand. It is my impression that this has been a part of
>> the project's culture anyway, and has happened with all big changes so far.
>>
>> Andreas.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Hugues Wisniewski <
>> hugues.wisniewski at autodesk.com> wrote:
>>
>>>  +1****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> > Now that we're at least 3 active proj4js committers, I'd like to
>>> establish a review policy****
>>>
>>> +1 for that****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Something to possibly also consider is the concept of RFCs used on
>>> MapGuide and CsMap (Request For Change)****
>>>
>>> When many from different teams and companies work on the same project,
>>> it’s nice to be notified ahead of time of major changes coming up. Others
>>> have time to prepare and react, possibly asking or suggesting changes.**
>>> **
>>>
>>> This is the CsMap page, which is based on the MapGuide RFC process****
>>>
>>> http://trac.osgeo.org/csmap/wiki/CsMapRfcs****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Hugues****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> *From:* metacrs-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:
>>> metacrs-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] *On Behalf Of *Andreas Hocevar
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 05, 2013 8:36 PM
>>> *To:* metacrs at lists.osgeo.org; Calvin Metcalf; Mike Adair
>>> *Subject:* [MetaCRS] Give Calvin Metcalf commit access to proj4js;
>>> proj4js review policy****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Hey,****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> I'd like to propose to give Calvin Metcalf commit access to the proj4js
>>> repository on github. Calvin has shown great talent bringing bleeding edge
>>> JavaScript technologies to proj4js, and the many pull request of his that I
>>> merged were all of outstanding quality.****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> I am +1.****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Now that we're at least 3 active proj4js committers, I'd like to
>>> establish a review policy: Pull request - peer review - merge. This way
>>> every change will have a second pair of eyes look at it, which is good for
>>> QA.****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> I am +1.
>>> ****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> Thanks,****
>>>
>>> Andreas.****
>>>
>>>
>>> ****
>>>
>>> ** **
>>>
>>> --
>>> Andreas Hocevar
>>> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org/
>>> Expert service straight from the developers.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Andreas Hocevar
>>> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org/
>>> Expert service straight from the developers.
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MetaCRS mailing list
>> MetaCRS at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/metacrs
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/metacrs/attachments/20130907/6f0ca17d/attachment.html>