[Journal] Postponing Vol 4 regular articles

[Daniel Ames]

Tyler - this seems appropriate...  V5 will be all the better. - Dan

On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Tyler Mitchell (OSGeo) <
tmitchell at osgeo.org> wrote:

> I would like to propose we delay the production of volume 4 articles
> and use it to only focus on the Annual Report.  Then move all the
> "normal" articles to volume 5 (date to be determined).
>
> I regret not having not the time to focus on more than the report
> itself, nor will I have more time to do so for the upcoming couple
> weeks.  Also, the report itself will likely be over 30 pages and I
> believe this will detract from the value of the other articles.
>
> Editors, this means you will need to contact the authors and let them
> know things will be delayed.  And then you'll need to move the
> article files into v5 SVN, etc.  It will also provide more time for
> us to learn OJS and get the peer review process running.
>
> Any objections?  Any agreement?
>
> Tyler
> _______________________________________________
> newsletter mailing list
> newsletter at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/newsletter
>



-- 
Daniel P. Ames, PhD, PE
Geospatial Software Lab
Department of Geosciences
Idaho State University - Idaho Falls
amesdani at isu.edu
www.hydromap.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/newsletter/attachments/20080329/b6d7b47f/attachment.html