[Journal] Reviewers assigned

[Tyler Mitchell (OSGeo)]

> yes, I too suggested adding a checklist - Thierry has kindly  
> provided the actual questions,
> I think they are good.
> I would keep the numerical rating - the reviewer then expands and  
> explains the rating
> in the written part of the review. I usually do the rating first  
> and then explain, comment
> and make suggestions in the written part - it makes the writing  
> much easier.
> So you get 2 points for your graphics and then in the written part  
> I say that your graphics
> is unreadable and scale information is missing but I find it  
> important for
> the paper so please improve it.
>
> It is great that we are getting this moving,

Okay, I'll poke around in the system tomorrow and see where/how to  
fit in the reviewer feedback cycle in a more structured way.  Thanks  
for the feedback, let me know if you want to have a peek in the  
system too - the more the merrier.