[Journal] Next steps

[Sunburned Surveyor]

Dan wrote: "I see this as a bit of an extreme option, but something
that might be worth considering..."

I don't think it is an extreme option at all, but sounds quite
reasonable. We can steer our scientific articles to JOSIS, which will
allow us to streamline (and possibly speed up) the production of the
OSGeo Journal.

This option wouldn't mean we couldn't have good peer review as part of
our publication process in the Journal, but we could run it more like
a traditional newsletter or magazine.

Do we already have a good contact with the JOSIS team that could be
used to explore this idea further?

Landon

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 2:55 AM, Suchith Anand
<Suchith.Anand at nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:
> I think this is good idea . In fact, i am exploring the possibility of a
> special issue of JOSIS based on selected full papers for next year's OSGIS
> 2010 conference. I think OSGeo should explore possibility of having
> dedicated special issues in key Geospatial journals of selection of full
> papers submitted to FOSS4G conferences and JOSIS is a good starting point.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Suchith
>
> Dr Suchith Anand
> Centre for Geospatial Science
> Sir Clive Granger Building
> University of Nottingham
> Tel: (0)115 846 8408
> http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/cgs/cgs_suchith_anand.html
> http://www.opensourcegis.org.uk/
> http://ica-opensource.scg.ulaval.ca/
>
> ________________________________
> From: newsletter-bounces at lists.osgeo.org on behalf of Rafal Wawer
> Sent: Wed 30/09/2009 09:31
> To: Daniel P. Ames
> Cc: newsletter at lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: RE: [Journal] Next steps
>
> Interesting idea Dan,
> It would consolidate efford and as the JOSIS is already a while on the stage
> it could attract more authors.. I guess. On the other hand the publications
> on FOSS4G may dissolve in overall spatial pot, next to papers on
> proprietary solutions (-;
> The future journal of OSGeo, we were discussing about, is to be seen as
> addressing all the aspects of FOSS4G: news, events, scientific papers,
> applications, education, etc. Personally - it is what I would like to have
> as a reader... but my background is also scientific. For ICT specialists as
> well as for GI experts and users the scientific content may not be that
> important.
> Certainly Dan's idea is worth considering!
>
> What I like in the setup of JOSIS is the mechanizm fo discussions on
> submitted papers. Nice idea to have it along with the review and not as
> usuall - after publishing.
>
> Best regards:
> RAf
>
>
> Dr. Rafal Wawer
> K.U.Leuven
> R&D Division SADL (Spatial Application Division)
> Celestijnenlaan 200e bus 2224
> BE-3001 Leuven-Heverlee
> Belgium
> tel. 0032 16 329731
>
> ________________________________
> From: newsletter-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> [mailto:newsletter-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Daniel P. Ames
> Sent: 30 September 2009 08:14
> To: Barry Rowlingson
> Cc: Tyler Mitchell (OSGeo); newsletter at lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [Journal] Next steps
>
> Barry, I'm glad you mentioned JOSIS. I was about to comment on this myself,
> and you beat me to it! These folks have some ideals that are fairly well
> aligned with OSGeo ideals and it would be nice to support them. I suppose
> there are a couple of ways to do that. One is to contact them about some
> kind of a merger whereby JOSIS accepts some OSGeo people as board members
> and in return OSGeo adopts JOSIS as it's officially sanctioned outlet for
> research publication. I see this as a bit of an extreme option, but
> something that might be worth considering... - Dan
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Barry Rowlingson
> <b.rowlingson at lancaster.ac.uk> wrote:
>>
>> Has everyone else seen JOSIS:
>>
>> http://josis.org/index.php/josis/index
>>
>> it seems to be run on volunteer effort, and needs 3 editors-in-chief
>> and a whole load of luminaries on the editorial board. Plus
>> who-knows-how-many reviewers (they just got one more).
>>
>> They're also using OJS for journal management, and seem to have open
>> comments on pre-published articles.
>>
>>  They don't seem to say how often they publish an issue though.
>> Perhaps these days the concept of an 'issue' is becoming meaningless,
>> and articles should just be published when the editor gets the reviews
>> and gives the okay? Click a button and there it is in everyone's RSS
>> feed.
>>
>> Barry
>> _______________________________________________
>> newsletter mailing list
>> newsletter at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/newsletter
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel P. Ames
> ----------------------------------
> www.danames.org
> dpames at gmail.com
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
> may still contain software viruses, which could damage your computer system:
> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
> University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
>
> _______________________________________________
> newsletter mailing list
> newsletter at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/newsletter
>
>