[Journal] Update on Volume 11

[Landon Blake]

Eli:

Thank you for all of the review and copy editing. Your doing a great
job and I really appreciate the help.

You wrote: "I have reviewed this with minor corrections,
http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/changeset/9210.  "5) Non-Spatial
Relationships" needs to be added to the Structural elements of a GIS
data model box to match the earlier list."

Did you already commit this change? If not, please do so.

You wrote: "I think that the annotated included entity diagram and
simple feature type attribute diagram are very useful whereas the last
two (particularly rotated) are less useful and certainly appear less
integral to the article."

I will delete the last two diagrams and will add links to them instead.

You wrote: "Very minor corrections, http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/changeset/9212"

Have you already committed the changes to the editorial? If not, please do so.

Thanks!

Landon

PS - In the future, if you have minor edits, please commit them. I
trust your judgement.



On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Eli Adam <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Landon Blake <sunburned.surveyor at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> I made some major progress on Volume 11 today, which included
>> addressing (I hope) all of Eli's review comments and e-mails. I also
>> accomplished the following:
>>
>> - Created front and back covers.
>> - Renumbered pages.
>> - Fixed headers and footers.
>> - Created the editorial.
>> - Completed the topical article.
>> - Completed the case study article.
>> - Created the table of contents.
>>
>> This means the following are available for review:
>>
>> - The case study. (Applying OpenJUMP to the Management of Sanitary
>> Sewer Networks)
>> - The topical article. (Sharing GIS Data Models)
>
>
> I have reviewed this with minor corrections,
> http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/changeset/9210.  "5) Non-Spatial Relationships"
> needs to be added to the Structural elements of a GIS data model box to
> match the earlier list.  I think that the annotated included entity diagram
> and simple feature type attribute diagram are very useful whereas the last
> two (particularly rotated) are less useful and certainly appear less
> integral to the article.
>
>>
>> - The editorial.
>
>
> Very minor corrections, http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/changeset/9212
>
>>
>> Here is what I will be working on tomorrow:
>> - Complete the article introducing the SurveyOS Project KML Toolkit.
>> - Complete the Editor's Footnote entitled "Do we need a journal?"
>>
>> If I can finish both of these tomorrow, we can get our final review of
>> the master PDF in Wednesday and Thursday. We can then publish Volume
>> 11 on Friday.
>>
>
> I'd like this journal release to be more definitive and with more fanfare
> than the last volume.  Also, if someone other than Landon or me  would read
> the final, that could be helpful since after reading it 5 times the critical
> eye is perhaps impaired.
>
> Eli
>
>> If that happens, I'll work on an HTML version of a selection of some
>> of the articles next week. I'd like to post these on the Journal blog
>> and make them available in an edition for Google Currents.
>>
>> Landon
>> _______________________________________________
>> newsletter mailing list
>> newsletter at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/newsletter
>
>