[Journal] 2012 Annual Report

[Landon Blake]

Eli:

It looks the page number problem with the Ottawa Chapter Report is fixed.
Could you do your final check? I'd like to try to get this issue published
next week so I can start work on the next volume.

Thanks!

Landon

On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 8:44 PM, Landon Blake <sunburned.surveyor at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks for another check Eli. I'll see if I can make time to button up
> these edits this coming week.
>
> Landon
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Eli Adam <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us> wrote:
>
>> Hey Landon,
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Landon Blake
>> <sunburned.surveyor at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Eli:
>> >
>> > I made an SVN commit. I'm not sure how many of my changes got through
>> > because my working copy was out of date, but it looks like the only
>> conflict
>> > was with the Romanian Chapter. I'll see if I can get that conflict
>> resolved
>> > and then I'll look at your other comments. I'll try to do this before
>> the
>> > end of the work week.
>>
>> Thanks for the commit.  I made and committed a few minor fixes,
>> https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/changeset/12602/
>>
>> The page number 27 is bold and black instead of small and green (at
>> least in the PDF).
>>
>> Once you think that we are close and update the master PDF, let me
>> know and I'll run through all the copy editing steps, including spell
>> check.  http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Copy_Editing
>>
>> Looks good!  Thanks for working on it.  I'm looking forward to completing
>> it.
>>
>> Best regards, Eli
>>
>> >
>> > Landon
>> >
>> > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Eli Adam <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Landon Blake
>> >> <sunburned.surveyor at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > Eli asked me to wrap up the final edits to the 2012 Annual Report.
>> Here
>> >> > are
>> >> > his comments and my changes:
>> >>
>> >> The first comment was that I fixed many minor things in svn in
>> >> revision https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/changeset/11997/.  I don't see
>> >> those changes reflected in this most recent attachment.  I also don't
>> >> see any of your updates in svn.  I'm under the impression that we are
>> >> collaboratively working on Journal development just like source code
>> >> so we would svn update, then make changes, then svn commit.  Seeing
>> >> diffs also makes it easier to see what changes have been made rather
>> >> than trying to look at everything again.
>> >>
>> >> The rest of these comments were things that I couldn't fix myself in
>> >> the sources.
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > 1. Almost no urls are linked.  I don't know if urls are supposed to
>> be
>> >> > blue hyperlinks or not.  If they are not, then they should be spelled
>> >> > out (which might help rather than hiding them anyway)
>> >> >
>> >> > The attached copy doesn't have any hyperlinks. Hopefully that will
>> solve
>> >> > this problem.
>> >>
>> >> Looks good.
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > 2. Landon can you review the first paragraph of the editorial and
>> >> > double check year (2014 vs 2012), the sentence that says 4 is an
>> >> > increase from 4, and decide if you really want to spell and
>> >> > parenthesis numbers -- four (4)?
>> >> >
>> >> > This has been fixed.
>> >>
>> >> Looks mostly good.  If it were in svn, I would change "2" to "two" for
>> >> consistency in the first paragraph.
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > 3. The Australia/New Zealand Report says "We need this content" - get
>> >> > content of delete.
>> >> >
>> >> > This has been fixed.
>> >>
>> >> It seems to still be there.  Maybe the pdf didn't get regenerated for
>> >> this report.
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > 4. The Francophone Chapter is missing a map.
>> >> >
>> >> > I had a map previously, but the chapter asked for its removal. This
>> is a
>> >> > language chapter rather than a country specific chapter. :]
>> >>
>> >> I see, now I know.
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > 5. The Romanian Chapter has six things that should be urls that say,
>> >> > "can be found here" and don't appear to have link information
>> >> >
>> >> > Couldn't find this problem, but I fixed some other layout errors.
>> >>
>> >> Check page 37 and 38. Try searching for "can be found here".
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > 6. The Incubation Report seems to contain an entire section on the
>> >> > ICA-OSGeo Lab Network.  I don't see that as in the realm of the
>> >> > Incubation Committee and question whether the Incubation Committee
>> >> > should be reporting on that (or if the Journal should be presenting
>> >> > the ICA-OSGeo Lab Network as part of the Incubation Committee work).
>> >> > I would welcome the ICA-OSGeo Lab Network having their own report and
>> >> > section.
>> >> >
>> >> > Fixed. I think this was a copy/paste error on my part.
>> >>
>> >> This now appears to be the correct report.  Once the sources are in
>> >> svn, I'll review and copy edit it.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for the revisions.
>> >>
>> >> Eli
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > Please review the attached and let me know if other changes are
>> needed.
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks!
>> >> >
>> >> > Landon
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > newsletter mailing list
>> >> > newsletter at lists.osgeo.org
>> >> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/newsletter
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/newsletter/attachments/20160630/73f521e5/attachment.html>