[Aust-NZ] Re: [GeoNetwork-devel] Merging new developments into core (was: Finding a way forward)

[Bruce.Bannerman at dpi.vic.gov.au]

IMO:


Simon,

> (leaving aside the mildly annoying statements like lack of progress :-)) 



I don't want to keep on repeating this. This email thread is not about 
pointing the finger.


My original email said 'perceived' lack of progress.



This is a perception that I'm hearing from a number of sources (at least 
six major spatial organisations around Australia).

It is a valid concern and relates in part to communications.



I have seen the announcements of successive GeoNetwork ANZLIC Profile 
Betas on the Uni Tas GeoNetwork list. So I do know that progress is being 
made.


Cameron identified some potential causes of this in his earlier email.



Let's not dwell on this, but find a way forward that benefits all.




Bruce Bannerman





Notice:
This email and any attachments may contain information that is personal, 
confidential, legally privileged and/or copyright.No part of it should be reproduced, 
adapted or communicated without the prior written consent of the copyright owner. 

It is the responsibility of the recipient to check for and remove viruses.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by return email, delete 
it from your system and destroy any copies. You are not authorised to use, communicate or rely on the information 
contained in this email.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/oceania/attachments/20080521/715f850e/attachment.html>