[OpenLayers-Dev] new WFS layer name
Stephen Woodbridge
woodbri at swoodbridge.com
Mon Mar 12 22:24:27 EDT 2007
Christopher Schmidt wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 09:01:38PM -0500, Stephen Woodbridge wrote:
>> Christopher Schmidt wrote:
>>> So, we have a new vector-based wfs layer. We need to keep the old layer
>>> naming the same for backwards compatibility. How do we name the new
>>> vector-based WFS layer?
>>> Layer.WFS.Vector
>>> Layer.VectorWFS
>>> Layer.WFST
>>> Layer.Vector.WFS
>>>
>>> ?
>>>
>>> There is a similar question once we implement a vector-based GeoRSS
>>> layer, if ever; This might lead towards a tendancy for Layer.Vector.WFS,
>>> Layer.Vector.GeoRSS, etc.
>
>> I like the Layer.Vector.* designation. this is easily expandable as
>> required.
>
> Does it need to apply to layers which are unambiguous? (Layer.GML)
>
> Regards,
At the risk of reversing my opinion, since we only have a few of these
and it would probably be good if the variants are list side by side in a
listing. I think something like:
Layer.WFS
Layer.WFSVector
Layer.WFS.Vector
Layer.WFS_V
Layer.WFST
Layer.GeoRSS
Layer.GeoRSSVector
Layer.GeoRSS.Vector
Layer.GeoRSS_V
would be better. I do not think we need to clutter the names space by
adding Vector to the Unambiguous ones.
-Steve
More information about the Dev
mailing list