[OpenLayers-Dev] bbox strategy and zooming
Tim Schaub
tschaub at opengeo.org
Thu Nov 13 16:19:58 EST 2008
Hey-
Oh, and one more thing...
Eric Lemoine wrote:
> Thanks for putting this patch together Tim.
>
> Initially Chris wanted that the bbox strategy behave aggressively on
> zoom in, but, as an optimization, only if the number of features in
> the layer is not lower than the maxfeatures value set in the protocol.
>
> The change you're proposing wouldn't allow this. The change I proposed
> involved adding a new Integer option to the bbox strategy. If that
> option is null the strategy behaves as currently. If it's non-null
> then it behaves aggressively if the number of features in the layer is
> not lower than the option value.
>
> Chris was concerned with configuration data duplication - maxfeatures
> is kinda set in the protocol as well as in the strategy; which doesn't
> bother me actually.
>
> You may concerned with the fact that my proposed option targets a
> specific case (maxfeatures-parameterized requests) and doesn't address
> other, maybe more common, cases. I actually don't see other cases when
> a more aggressive mode makes sense, but that's probably just me.
>
Other use cases: I have a service that returns the top ten pizza joints
in any bounding box. You don't get to ask for the top 11.
A nice service would be one that returned different level of detail
depending on the extent of the request. You ask for the world, I give
you a simplified road network. You ask for your neighborhood, I give
you a bit more detail. Obviously, you'd want to be able to have control
over what you ask for - but some clients (say Google Earth) don't let
you tweak request parameters (aside from bbox) as you navigate around.
Tim
PS - I don't really have a pizza service. But flickr searches take a
bbox and impose a limit on the number of items returned. And feeds from
big search services typically limit the number of results they return.
> Cheers,
>
> Eric
>
> 2008/11/13, Tim Schaub <tschaub at opengeo.org>:
>> Hey-
>>
>> Christopher Schmidt wrote:
>>> I'm still lost as to how to go about coding what I want :) I want to
>>> have maxfeatures, and more aggressive invalidation because of it. Any
>>> suggestinos as to how I might go about implementing that, or should I
>>> just toss together something and people will look at afterwards?
>>>
>> If you haven't already tossed something together, see the patch for
>> http://trac.openlayers.org/ticket/1830.
>>
>> Set resFactor to 1 if you want to request features with every change in
>> resolution.
>>
>> Tim
>>
>>> Regards,
>>
>> --
>> Tim Schaub
>> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
>> Expert service straight from the developers.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dev mailing list
>> Dev at openlayers.org
>> http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>>
--
Tim Schaub
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.
More information about the Dev
mailing list