[OpenLayers-Dev] Format.WFST: misleading name
bartvde at osgis.nl
bartvde at osgis.nl
Mon Mar 16 06:08:51 EDT 2009
Hi list,
maybe it's a bit too late to startup this discussion, but anyway, I think
the name Format.WFST is a bit misleading, and I would prefer Format.WFS.
It's misleading since it implies only transactional stuff, but Format.WFST
also writes out stuff for non-transactional requests, such as GetFeature.
If you look at the OGC spec, you'll see that the term WFS-T (or WFST) is
not even an official name. The WFS spec has basic (read-only) and
transactional parts and that is exactly what this format implements, so
Format.WFS is more logical to me.
What do others think?
Best regards,
Bart
More information about the Dev
mailing list