[OpenLayers-Dev] GeoExt proposal
Tim Schaub
tschaub at opengeo.org
Mon Mar 30 14:00:36 EDT 2009
Hey-
So, I'm picking up the GeoExt governance proposal again.
Please see the links below for a history of the issue [1], [2].
The executive summary follows: GeoExt is a new project that brings
OpenLayers functionality to Ext JS widgets and data utilities. The
GeoExt PSC would like to assign copyright for the code to OSGeo. OSGeo
suggested that out of courtesy, the GeoExt PSC make a proposal to an
OSGeo member project asking the member project to accept a role in the
governance of the new project.
The responsibilities of this role (for the OpenLayers PSC and for the
GeoExt PSC) are described here:
http://www.geoext.org/trac/geoext/wiki/governance
What does this mean for the OpenLayers PSC?
-------------------------------------------
The OpenLayers PSC will ask the GeoExt PSC to provide evidence that code
contributions are free from encumbrances. Further, the OpenLayers PSC
will provide guidance to the GeoExt PSC if it appears that GeoExt is in
violation of any other criteria of an OSGeo member project.
What does this means for the GeoExt PSC?
----------------------------------------
The GeoExt PSC will gather signed license agreements from code
contributors. It will provide a report (periodically or generated on
demand) all contributors and status of their CLA. In addition, the
GeoExt PSC will continue to govern the project in a way that conforms
with the guidelines for OSGeo member projects.
What does this *not* mean?
--------------------------
The OpenLayers PSC will *not* be responsible for examining the commit
logs, tracking down code contributors, asking individuals to sign the
CLA, or any duties that have to do with technical aspects of managing
the GeoExt project. The OpenLayers PSC will also *not* vote on issues
before the GeoExt PSC.
Why is this happening?
----------------------
See the links below for a little history. Basically, anyone can assign
copyright to OSGeo. Frank Warmerdam suggested that the OSGeo would
probably be happier about having copyright assigned if a current member
project accepted some role in the governance of the new project (the one
assigning copyright). OSGeo doesn't have any real responsibility for
the non-member projects that assign it copyright. By extension,
OpenLayers does not assume any real liability under this agreement (its
status as a member project is not jeopardized if the terms of the
agreement are not met). This is largely a courtesy to the OSGeo.
So, as a member of the OpenLayers PSC, I'd like to propose that we
accept this role in the governance of the GeoExt PSC. I'm happy to
answer any more specific questions about what this means.
Thanks for the vote and/or questions.
Tim
[1] http://n2.nabble.com/copyright-question-td2088465.html
[2] http://n2.nabble.com/proposal-for-GeoExt-governance-td2477185.html
--
Tim Schaub
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.
More information about the Dev
mailing list