[OpenLayers-Dev] please vote on OpenLayers 2.9 final
Bart van den Eijnden
bartvde at osgis.nl
Wed Apr 14 04:15:03 EDT 2010
I just had confirmation from the person who reported the bug that the fix works for him, see also:
On Apr 14, 2010, at 6:33 AM, Eric Lemoine wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 14, 2010, <christopher.schmidt at nokia.com> wrote:
>> (Hadn't subscribed to the dev list with new address yet, sorry about
>> -- Chris
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>> From: "Schmidt Christopher (Nokia-S/Cambridge)" <christopher.schmidt at nokia.com
>>> Date: April 13, 2010 3:24:07 PM EDT
>>> To: ext Bart van den Eijnden <bartvde at osgis.nl>
>>> Cc: OpenLayers Dev <dev at openlayers.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [OpenLayers-Dev] please vote on OpenLayers 2.9 final
>>> On Apr 13, 2010, at 3:17 PM, ext Bart van den Eijnden wrote:
>>>> Hi list,
>>>> since OpenLayers 2.9RC2 has been released one issue has been fixed
>>>> (wrt the KML format), which was clearly a regression from OL 2.8,
>>>> see http://trac.openlayers.org/ticket/2398 for the details.
>>>> To me it seems this is a trivial fix and it does not need another
>>>> RC, so I am calling for a vote on OpenLayers 2.9 final. May I have
>>>> your votes please? TIA.
>>> In general, I don't believe in "too small for an RC", but I'm also
>>> willing to defer to the community. I'm -0 on going without another
>>> release, just because I've seen cases where very minor things have
>>> resulted in a broken build in particular use cases.
>>> However, this vote doesn't block a release, and I defer to others on
>>> the right way to go.
> If the people who hit the KML format bug have reported that the fix
> works for them I'm +1 on not doing RC3 and releasing 2.9.
> Eric Lemoine
> Camptocamp France SAS
> Savoie Technolac, BP 352
> 73377 Le Bourget du Lac, Cedex
> Tel : 00 33 4 79 44 44 96
> Mail : eric.lemoine at camptocamp.com
> Dev mailing list
> Dev at openlayers.org
More information about the Dev