[OpenLayers-Dev] Re: [OpenLayers 3] type instantiation performance
christopher.schmidt at nokia.com
christopher.schmidt at nokia.com
Thu Oct 21 17:08:13 EDT 2010
On Oct 21, 2010, at 4:45 PM, ext Xavier Mamano (jorix) wrote:
Good appreciation Andreas, now Chome is still the best but it's not a
>
> miracle :-)
Er, not to be too critical here or anything, but it does look like
Safari beats Chrome in every case except the one we're trying to
discuss throwing away :)
-- Chris
> IE 8.0.6
> OpenLayers.Class; 2152.1
> Pure JavaScript; 1081.5
> Object Litteral; 911.9
> OpenLayers.Pixel; 2091.1
> Pure JavaScript Pixel; 1089.0
> Pure JavaScript Pixel using argument options; 1437.2
>
> FF 3.6.11 + Firebug
> OpenLayers.Class; 1164.9
> Pure JavaScript; 275.8
> Object Litteral; 281.0
> OpenLayers.Pixel; 1179.2
> Pure JavaScript Pixel; 274.0
> Pure JavaScript Pixel using argument options; 377.2
>
> Safari 5.0.2
> OpenLayers.Class; 586.8
> Pure JavaScript; 80.8
> Object Litteral; 95.8
> OpenLayers.Pixel; 640.2
> Pure JavaScript Pixel; 84.6
> Pure JavaScript Pixel using argument options; 110.6
>
> Chrome 6.0.4
> OpenLayers.Class; 250.6
> Pure JavaScript; 135.7
> Object Litteral; 136.1
> OpenLayers.Pixel; 249.8
> Pure JavaScript Pixel; 133.7
> Pure JavaScript Pixel using argument options; 141.7
>
> I put also :
> p = {x: parseFloat(23.4), y: parseFloat(42.4)};
> in Object Litteral (case 3).
>
>
> I have attached the changed test:
> http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/file/n5660273/_class_.html
> _class_.html .
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Xavier
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/OpenLayers-3-type-instantiation-performance-tp5641805p5660273.html
> Sent from the OpenLayers Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> Dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
More information about the Dev
mailing list