[OpenLayers-Dev] 2.10 and 2.11-RC1 OpenLayers.Class behavior
changes
RICHARD Didier
didier.richard at ign.fr
Wed Aug 3 17:08:28 EDT 2011
>>>> 2/ in test 4, if you remove the initialize function from B and
>>>> overload
>>>> A,
>>>> the B constructor is still the previous A's constructor.
>>>
>>> Yes. To address this one I see no other solution than patching
>>> OpenLayers.Class. See the patch attached to this email, and my
>>> test_overload_5 test function. The Class.html tests continue to pass
>>> with my patch.
>>>
>>
>> this works in OL 2.11, not in OL 2.10 for me !-(
>> I guess there is something similar to do in OL 2.10 ?
>
> Your initial mail was about OpenLayers trunk/2.11 introducing
> regressions. Now the failing test that remains is OL 2.10-only, so OL
> trunk/2.11 works better than OL 2.10 for you. Yippee! :-)
>
My initial mail was really about regression between 2.10 and 2.11 !-)
> (Not sure it is worth "fixing" OL 2.10 for that.)
>
Well, one of my test is versus the current release (2.10) and I am sure
there are users that will migrate slower than us (I mean OL and IGNF) ...
I do think it is worth fixing it ... at least to prove there is no
regression !-D
Regards,
didier
> --
> Eric Lemoine
>
> Camptocamp France SAS
> Savoie Technolac, BP 352
> 73377 Le Bourget du Lac, Cedex
>
> Tel : 00 33 4 79 44 44 96
> Mail : eric.lemoine at camptocamp.com
> http://www.camptocamp.com
>
--
RICHARD Didier - Chef du pôle technique du Géoportail
2/4, avenue Pasteur - 94165 Saint Mandé Cedex
Tél : +33 (0) 1 43 98 83 23
More information about the Dev
mailing list