[OpenLayers-Dev] Re: Layer.GoogleNG with less overhead and better OpenLayers integration

[Joe Franklin]

Seems to work great.  The only change I added to make it work the same as the old Google layer was to add "wrapDateLine: true" to the options  object in initialize(). Also, I have to call layer.redraw() if I change the map type (ie. after calling layer.mapObject.setMapTypeId with a different map type).



--- On Mon, 5/23/11, Andreas Hocevar <ahocevar at opengeo.org> wrote:

> From: Andreas Hocevar <ahocevar at opengeo.org>
> Subject: Re: [OpenLayers-Dev] Re: Layer.GoogleNG with less overhead and better OpenLayers integration
> To: "Fabian Patzke (OL)" <listensammler at patzi.de>
> Cc: dev at openlayers.org
> Date: Monday, May 23, 2011, 9:03 AM
> Thanks for the pointer. Fixed in the
> sandbox and patch updated.
> 
> Andreas.
> 
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Fabian Patzke (OL)
> <listensammler at patzi.de>
> wrote:
> > Looks really nice, though in your example the link to
> the google-ng.js source
> > points to google-v3.js. But that's just a small glitch
> :)
> > Thanks for that work,
> > Fabian
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/Layer-GoogleNG-with-less-overhead-and-better-OpenLayers-integration-tp6392366p6394314.html
> > Sent from the OpenLayers Dev mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dev mailing list
> > Dev at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Andreas Hocevar
> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org/
> Expert service straight from the developers.
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> Dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
>