[OpenLayers-Dev] MOTION: delete old branches

Eric Lemoine eric.lemoine at camptocamp.com
Tue Oct 11 13:19:04 EDT 2011


On Tuesday, October 11, 2011, Tim Schaub <tschaub at opengeo.org> wrote:
> I don't see real value in keeping around all of the old release
> branches.  If we were continuing to do releases in the 2.4.x series,
> for example, the 2.4 branch would have a clear purpose.  We can check
> out release tags to run tests or do other work with a specific
> release.  Can anyone point to a clear purpose for keeping around the
> old release branches?
>
> In case we do want to keep open the possibility of creating a patch
> release from an old minor release, we could keep around two release
> branches.  My motivation for cleaning up old release branches is that
> I like to run `git branch -avv` and the output is a bit ridiculous if
> you have a couple remotes.
>
> I'm +1 on getting rid of old release branches (keeping around the
> latest two if others think that is a good idea).
>
> If there is a compelling reason to keep around older branches, I'm
> open to changing my opinion.

This makes me wonder how maintainers use Git/github. I know a lot create
"release tags", but do they also create "release branches"? And if they
don't, how do they handle the case where they want to go back and do a
bugfix release?

If feels a bit weird to me to delete branches because the output of 'git
remote -avv' is ugly. But if "release branches" are unnecessary (and
possibly silly) when using Git and github I'm +1 on deleting them entirely,
and dedicating branches to shared experimental work or something.

-- 
Eric Lemoine

Camptocamp France SAS
Savoie Technolac, BP 352
73377 Le Bourget du Lac, Cedex

Tel : 00 33 4 79 44 44 96
Mail : eric.lemoine at camptocamp.com
http://www.camptocamp.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/openlayers-dev/attachments/20111011/c34023fa/attachment.html


More information about the Dev mailing list