[OpenLayers-Dev] issue tracker (Was: The SVN repository is outdated after moving trunck to GitHub)

Antoine Abt antoine.abt at camptocamp.com
Thu Oct 13 03:14:01 EDT 2011


 I’m +1. I'd prefer use the whole github stack.  

--
 Antoine Abt

 Camptocamp France SAS
 Savoie Technolac, BP 352
 73377 Le Bourget du Lac, Cedex

 Tel : 00 33 4 79 44 44 94
 Mail : antoine.abt at camptocamp.com (mailto:antoine.abt at camptocamp.com)
http://www.camptocamp.com

Le jeudi 13 octobre 2011 à 08:35, Bart van den Eijnden a écrit :

> +1 from me on using the github issue tracker.
>  
> Best regards,
> Bart
>  
> --  
> Bart van den Eijnden
> OSGIS - http://osgis.nl  
> On Oct 13, 2011, at 1:03 AM, Tim Schaub wrote:
> > Andreas and I have been evaluating the GitHub issue tracker (as I know
> > others have as well). While using it, we're still opening Trac
> > tickets.
> >  
> > For example, here's an issue related to improving dateline handling
> > for vector features:
> >  
> > In Trac http://trac.osgeo.org/openlayers/ticket/3526
> >  
> > And GitHub https://github.com/openlayers/openlayers/pull/11 (with
> > history https://github.com/openlayers/openlayers/pull/11/commits and a
> > summary diff https://github.com/openlayers/openlayers/pull/11/commits).
> >  
> > The benefits of the GitHub tracker are plain to me (but I've been sold
> > for a couple years). There's not any inline commenting going on here,
> > but it's a feature we use frequently elsewhere. I'll let the Trac
> > stalwarts extol its virtues.
> >  
> > Tim
> >  
> > On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 6:07 AM, Eric Lemoine
> > <eric.lemoine at camptocamp.com (mailto:eric.lemoine at camptocamp.com)> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 9:18 PM, <christopher.schmidt at nokia.com (mailto:christopher.schmidt at nokia.com)> wrote:
> > > > The SVN repository being out of date is because there are bugs in
> > > > git-svn that break everything. Figuring out a fix for this is still
> > > > soemthing I'm working on; I have a couple other tools that I'm trying
> > > > to get started with, but it is not being as trivial as it's supposed
> > > > to be. (ahocevar also offered me some advice as to how to get git to
> > > > do what I want.)
> > > >  
> > > > In the end, the problem we are trying to solve is not so hard that I can't
> > > > hack it with my own code if we have to get there; I know that it's
> > > > annoying, and I do want to fix it, I just haven't had a chance to yet.
> > > >  
> > > > Regarding reporting tickets -- that is something I will let other people
> > > > comment on. I don't have any specific views.
> > >  
> > >  
> > > At this point, and until we have decided otherwise, I think trac
> > > tickets should be created. Pull requests, referenced in tickets with
> > > URLs, can replace patches attached to tickets though.
> > >  
> > > --
> > > Eric Lemoine
> > >  
> > > Camptocamp France SAS
> > > Savoie Technolac, BP 352
> > > 73377 Le Bourget du Lac, Cedex
> > >  
> > > Tel : 00 33 4 79 44 44 96
> > > Mail : eric.lemoine at camptocamp.com (mailto:eric.lemoine at camptocamp.com)
> > > http://www.camptocamp.com
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Dev mailing list
> > > Dev at lists.osgeo.org (mailto:Dev at lists.osgeo.org)
> > > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
> >  
> >  
> >  
> > --  
> > Tim Schaub
> > OpenGeo http://opengeo.org/
> > Expert service straight from the developers.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dev mailing list
> > Dev at lists.osgeo.org (mailto:Dev at lists.osgeo.org)
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> Dev at lists.osgeo.org (mailto:Dev at lists.osgeo.org)
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-dev




More information about the Dev mailing list