[OpenLayers-Users] TileCache and KaMaps
Christopher Schmidt
crschmidt at metacarta.com
Wed Dec 6 13:32:41 EST 2006
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 11:18:12AM -0700, Tim Schaub wrote:
> > After spending last night hacking with Schuyler, I'm now
> > convinced that TileCache supports transparency correctly, and
> > that metaTiling is now of a quality where I trust it. It
> > doesn't do mapscript hacks to prevent labelling in the
> > metaBuffer area, but presuming a relatively small metabuffer
> > (and PARTIALS OFF, which doesn't cooperate well with ka-Map)
> > the difference between ka-Map and TileCache behavior is
> > probably minimal, and the benefits of switching are, in my
> > humble opinion, significant.
>
> Note that you don't need to rely on mapscript to prevent labels in a buffer
> around the edge of your map. If you're using MapServer to generate your
> tiles, there's a mapfile metadata hack for that (since 4.6):
>
> WEB
> ...
> METADATA
> "labelcache_map_edge_buffer" "10" #pixels
> END
> END
>
> also, don't forget
>
> PARTIALS FALSE
>
> Keep an eye on mapserver bug #1353 if you're hesitant to use "experimental"
> features (http://mapserver.gis.umn.edu/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1353).
Ooh! Super-good to know. That's the same one ka-map uses internally -- I
just assumed it was only in Mapscript for some reason. That's great! We
don't have to do anything special for MapServer metatiling then.
Regards,
--
Christopher Schmidt
MetaCarta
More information about the Users
mailing list