[OpenLayers-Users] openlayers vs mobile vs google

[Gilbert, Antoine]

With WMS layer only it's very fast

That strange because the google layer itself is not in the same contained than the WMS layer, so the transform should only affect the WMS one...

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Lemoine [mailto:eric.lemoine at camptocamp.com] 
Sent: 27 avril 2011 10:58
To: Gilbert, Antoine
Cc: openlayers-users at lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [OpenLayers-Users] openlayers vs mobile vs google

On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Gilbert, Antoine <AGilbert at korem.com> wrote:
> I just started again to play around with the new mobile stuff
>
> When I use a WMS layer on top of an OSM layer, gesture previewing work great, fluid, etc.
>
> For Google base layer, as discussed before, there is no gesture previewing, but I add a WMS layer on top the WMS layer is previewing correctly with gesture while Google layer stay unchanged until the end of the gesture. This is ok until the related DEV will be done.
>
> But in that case (WMS + Google), performance are slow, the WMS layer image resizing is sloppy. I wonder why. The same CSS transformation than with OSM should be applied in the same way with the same performance?

Yes. What if you have the WMS layer only?


-- 
Eric Lemoine

Camptocamp France SAS
Savoie Technolac, BP 352
73377 Le Bourget du Lac, Cedex

Tel : 00 33 4 79 44 44 96
Mail : eric.lemoine at camptocamp.com
http://www.camptocamp.com