[OpenLayers-Users] Best Practice for WFS-T

[Peter Lanz]

Dear Bart! 
Thanks for the reply, but I forgot to mention:
the service should enable users to edit features' attributes, not only their geometry.
I could not find any example implementation (aside from mapfish or tinyows) on the web capable of this requirement.

Thanks for further hints!
pedro
 



________________________________

peter lanz
 00491632465592
 berlin
 
 flasherei.net

 
 



>________________________________
> From: Bart van den Eijnden <bartvde at opengeo.org>
>To: Peter Lanz <peterlanz at yahoo.com> 
>Cc: "openlayers-users at lists.osgeo.org" <openlayers-users at lists.osgeo.org> 
>Sent: Monday, September 3, 2012 9:00 AM
>Subject: Re: [OpenLayers-Users] Best Practice for WFS-T
> 
>
>If you are already running GeoServer, I would stick with using GeoServer for WFS-T.
>
>
>Best regards,
>Bart
>
>
>-- 
>Bart van den Eijnden
>OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
>Expert service straight from the developers.
>
>
>
>
>On Aug 31, 2012, at 3:18 PM, Peter Lanz <peterlanz at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>Dear OpenLayers Community!
>>
>>
>>We are planning to set up a WFS-T:
>>PostgreSQL 9.1 (PostGIS 2.0) - GeoServer 2.1.4 - OpenLayers 2.12 - GeoExt 1.1
>>1 layer of point data with the goal of having point-attributes editable.
>>
>>
>>Due to lack of experience  I air this question to the ML: 
>>which tool would you choose for a WFS-T implementation? tinyOWS, MapFish or something else? 
>>Are there significant differences and grounds to choose one over the other?`
>>
>>
>>greatly appreciating help!
>>pedro
>> 
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>________________________________
>>
>>peter lanz
>> 00491632465592
>> berlin
>> 
>> flasherei.net
>>
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>>Users mailing list
>>Users at lists.osgeo.org
>>http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/openlayers-users
>>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/openlayers-users/attachments/20120904/c11911b9/attachment.html>