[osgeo4w-dev] Current filesystem tree sucks!
Jürgen E. Fischer
jef at norbit.de
Sat Sep 11 15:55:44 EDT 2010
On Sat, 11. Sep 2010 at 08:39:54 +0200, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> I will add that it is not very easy for us to uninstall and reinstall
> packages from bat files without adding an explicit dependency on the perl
> based apt interface to packages.
python - perl would be nice ;)
> Lacking an understanding of the need you are trying to express I am not to
> keen on taking action.
I also don't see a need for that. But it might be something to reconsider when
I don't quite see how update-alternatives would help. On Debian it's used to
switch executables - something gdal16.bat / gdal17.bat does on OSGeo4W (but
only for the current session).
The libraries are named diffently and as are the include directories (just that
the live in a separate directory in /usr/include).
Ok, some packages have a configuration script (like gdal-config) which could be
covered by update-alternatives. But we don't have those - because we don't
rely on a (unix) shell.
Maybe just prepending the appropriate paths to %LIB% and %INCLUDE% (just like
it's done for %PATH%) from gdal16.bat and gdal17.bat could be enough.
Jürgen E. Fischer norBIT GmbH Tel. +49-4931-918175-20
Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Rheinstraße 13 Fax. +49-4931-918175-50
Software Engineer D-26506 Norden http://www.norbit.de
norBIT Gesellschaft fuer Unternehmensberatung und Informationssysteme mbH
Rheinstrasse 13, 26506 Norden
GF: Jelto Buurman, HR: Amtsgericht Emden, HRB 5502
More information about the osgeo4w-dev