[osgeo4w-dev] java maintainer

[andrea antonello]

Hi Andreas,

> unfortunately i'm not familar with java-installs and package building.
> But if it was in apps, it would be easier to integrate with other projects? I think of GeoTools and GeoServer. Isn't "your" udig-package part of GeoTools?

uDig contains an own version of geotools.
And yes, it seems that if it was in apps, that would solve the
probelms. But then all java projects would need to adapt to it.
That is the point, someone would need to coordinate the groups so that
things do not break.

Cheers,
Andrea

> So come on java experts, we need you!
> Andreas
> --
> Dr. Andreas Müller -_- Universität Trier - FB VI - Kartographie, muellea at uni-trier.de
> 54286 Trier, Behringstr. 29, F 191, ++496512014576
>
> ________________________________________
> Von: osgeo4w-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [osgeo4w-dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org]" im Auftrag von "andrea antonello [andrea.antonello at gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 20. Februar 2015 07:15
> An: ML osgeo4w-dev
> Betreff: [osgeo4w-dev] java maintainer
>
> Dear all, but mainly java project maintainers,
> sadly at the moment I am no longer able to maintain the java package
> wit the proper response time.
> Since right now there are issues with some library conflicts, it is
> urgent to find someone that can take over and think about possible
> solutions.
>
> Right now, it seems that the only solution is to move java from
> library to app space, but the issue can be discussed here:
> http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo4w/ticket/441
>
> Is anyone of the java based projects willing to take care of the java package?
>
> If this doesn't happen, in order to not break other packages, I would
> have to remove the java package completely, which I do not think is a
> good idea.
>
> Please let me know,
> Cheers,
> Andrea
> _______________________________________________
> osgeo4w-dev mailing list
> osgeo4w-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/osgeo4w-dev