[Osgeo4w-trac] Re: [osgeo4w] #156: osgeo4w-regen.sh should test for
standardized package name
OSGeo4W
trac_osgeo4w at osgeo.org
Tue Mar 9 14:36:05 EST 2010
#156: osgeo4w-regen.sh should test for standardized package name
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Reporter: warmerdam | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Component: Package
Version: | Resolution:
Keywords: liblas |
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Changes (by maphew):
* status: assigned => new
* cc: hobu.inc at gmail, com (added)
* component: Installer => Package
* summary: apt list python error => osgeo4w-regen.sh should test for
standardized package name
* owner: maphew =>
* keywords: apt => liblas
* type: defect => enhancement
Comment:
I'm pushing this over to Component:Packaging. According to the
[http://cygwin.com/setup.html#naming cygwin package guide] the '''-N'''
syntax is the ''package-version'', which may also be thought of the as the
''osgeo4w version'', while the `1.1.1` (and variants) syntax is the
upstream or vendor version number.
Assuming I've read the history correct, in the case of liblas the package
should be "liblas-1.2.1'''-1'''.tar.bz2" as this is the first o4w release
of the 1.2.1 lidas library.
The fact that setup.exe installed this non-standard package name anyway is
probably a bug, and more importantly `osgeo4w-regen.sh` should test for
this too. I've adjusted this issue accordingly; change it back if you
disagree :)
I'll document the naming convention in PackagingInstructions.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo4w/ticket/156#comment:2>
OSGeo4W <http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo4w>
OSGeo4W is the Windows installer for the OSGeo stack.
More information about the Osgeo4w-trac
mailing list