[Osgeo4w-trac] Re: [osgeo4w] #156: osgeo4w-regen.sh should test for standardized package name

OSGeo4W trac_osgeo4w at osgeo.org
Tue Mar 9 14:36:05 EST 2010


#156: osgeo4w-regen.sh should test for standardized package name
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Reporter:  warmerdam    |        Owner:         
    Type:  enhancement  |       Status:  new    
Priority:  major        |    Component:  Package
 Version:               |   Resolution:         
Keywords:  liblas       |  
------------------------+---------------------------------------------------
Changes (by maphew):

  * status:  assigned => new
 * cc: hobu.inc at gmail, com (added)
  * component:  Installer => Package
  * summary:  apt list python error => osgeo4w-regen.sh should test for
              standardized package name
  * owner:  maphew =>
  * keywords:  apt => liblas
  * type:  defect => enhancement

Comment:

 I'm pushing this over to Component:Packaging. According to the
 [http://cygwin.com/setup.html#naming cygwin package guide] the '''-N'''
 syntax is the ''package-version'', which may also be thought of the as the
 ''osgeo4w version'',  while the `1.1.1` (and variants) syntax is the
 upstream or vendor version number.

 Assuming I've read the history correct, in the case of liblas the package
 should be "liblas-1.2.1'''-1'''.tar.bz2" as this is the first o4w release
 of the 1.2.1 lidas library.

 The fact that setup.exe installed this non-standard package name anyway is
 probably a bug, and more importantly `osgeo4w-regen.sh` should test for
 this too. I've adjusted this issue accordingly; change it back if you
 disagree :)

 I'll document the naming convention in PackagingInstructions.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo4w/ticket/156#comment:2>
OSGeo4W <http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo4w>
OSGeo4W is the Windows installer for the OSGeo stack.


More information about the Osgeo4w-trac mailing list