[Live-demo] Re: [Marketing] Marketing artefacts, subversion directories, and source formats
cameron.shorter at gmail.com
Sun May 16 03:31:46 PDT 2010
This is certainly getting closer, but I'll add a couple more issues
which would be highly desirable.
1. Fixed layout:
* I believe each Project Overview should be limited to 1 page, including
an image. Working in word, a writer can easily see whether they are over
the page max or not. With a wiki, you need to go through the PDF
creation to verify page size (which while un-desirable, is an acceptable
There are going to be lots of cases where people will want to
cut-and-paste from overview documents into other marketing material. Eg:
copying all relevant overviews into a Technology Comparison paper, or
copying Project Overviews of all projects which support a particular OGC
standard, for an OGC Standard Overview.
The doc that you copy into will probably have its own formatting
Cut and paste from a Word doc to Word/Open Office doc is relatively
easy. Copy from PDF to anything else is painful, because all the
header/footer information and hard CRs are copied too, and all
formatting needs to be reapplied.
Copying from HTML may be easier. But again I don't think formatting
copies across well.
Tyler Mitchell wrote:
> Nice pointer Hamish. I started to look into this a while back when I
> actually installed wiki -> latex on our wiki, but I never got back to
> the PDF stuff. I wonder how easy it is to get installed.
> I don't see why we can't just keep a text file and images in SVN or
> even in the wiki. The barrier to entry is essentially nil. The
> layout then would be up to us and our templates. Then let something
> else do the layout with a little help from those who know the tools.
> I'd volunteer to help run a bunch of the files through a template to
> produce both the HTML and PDF. Both of which could be done in a
> single run of latex. But if it means opening up a word doc one by one
> by one by .. twenty+ .. I doubt we'll get any volunteers.
> That's just me and I'm prone to take on more than I can handle. I'd
> say to add to the artifacts idea, give them a max number of words for
> each paragraph, a set number of short bullet points, ask for an image
> size (as you've done). We could then give them a template to try it
> out in - even a word doc. Once it works, then just save the text
> files into svn and we can take it from there.
> I could be wrong, but getting simple text files will be hard enough ;-)
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Hamish <hamish_b at yahoo.com>
> Date: Saturday, May 15, 2010 6:46 pm
> Subject: Re: [Live-demo] Re: [Marketing] Marketing artefacts,
> subversion directories, and source formats
> To: tech at wildintellect.com, Cameron Shorter <cameron.shorter at gmail.com>
> Cc: OSGeo Marketing <marketing at lists.osgeo.org>,
> "live-demo at lists.osgeo.org" <live-demo at lists.osgeo.org>
> > Cameron:
> > > > (Of note: Wikis do well under the above criteria, but
> > > > wiki->pdf doesn't do well)
> > Hamish:
> > > now it does! see post with links of a few days ago or go to
> > > wikipedia.org and try the brand new "export as pdf" in the
> > > left side frame on any article.
> > example-
> > input:
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_anemone
> > output:
> > _______________________________________________
> > Live-demo mailing list
> > Live-demo at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
> > http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
Tel: +61 (0)2 8570 5050
Mob: +61 (0)419 142 254
Think Globally, Fix Locally
Geospatial Solutions enhanced with Open Standards and Open Source
More information about the Osgeolive