[Live-demo] [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo-Live metrics going public in next 9.5 release

[Cameron Shorter]

Hi Jody,
1. My observation of activity graphs is that they show percentage 
activity per project, showing that a project is increasing, decreasing, 
or remaining stable in commits per month. So a 100% bar on one project 
might relate to 20 people committing, while the same 100% bar on another 
project equates to commits from 2 people.

2. OpenLayers is included, it is the first item under "Browser Facing GIS"

3. JTS is categorised under "GeoSpatial Libraries", which I assume 
should be the correct category. Do believe that JTS should be 
categorised differently? How so?

Warm regards, Cameron

On 31/01/2016 6:40 pm, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Thanks that is very interesting - any idea if the activity graphs are 
> comparable?
>
> A few notes:
> - I did not see open layers on the list
> - JTS seems to be in the wrong category.
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 7:50 AM Micha Silver <micha at arava.co.il 
> <mailto:micha at arava.co.il>> wrote:
>
>
>
>     Hi Cameron:
>     Very nice. I'll be sure to point to this information at the OSGeo
>     Live "short course" at EGU2016.
>     Seems strange that the overall OSGeo Live project language is
>     Javascript.
>
>     Also, Spatialite is, unfortunately, very poorly represented. The
>     developer uses fossil as his version control, and AFAIK, OpenHub
>     doesn't talk to fossil.
>
>     Thanks,
>     Micha
>
>     ------ Original Message ------
>     Subject: [Live-demo] OSGeo-Live metrics going public in next 9.5
>     release
>     Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 14:38:07 +1100
>     To: Live-demo, Osgeo Discussions
>     From: Cameron Shorter
>
>
>     On 1/31/2016 5:38 AM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
>>     With the upcoming OSGeo-Live 9.5 release, we will make OpenHub
>>     metrics very visible, adding a "Metrics" tab from the main
>>     OSGeo-Live page, which links to our existing OSGeo-Live OpenHub
>>     summaries.
>>
>>     Most OSGeo-Live projects have very compelling metrics,
>>     demonstrating an established and active development community.
>>     However, there are a few projects where OpenHub metrics are
>>     dated, incorrectly suggesting a lack of project activity. As
>>     such, I encourage all projects to review their OpenHub metrics
>>     before the next OSGeo-Live release, and update where appropriate.
>>
>>     Start by looking here: http://live.osgeo.org/en/metrics.html
>>
>>     If you have any questions, please ping me, or one of the other
>>     people in the OSGeo-Live team.
>>
>>     Warm regards,
>>     -- 
>>     Cameron Shorter,
>>     Software and Data Solutions Manager
>>     LISAsoft
>>     Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf,
>>     26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009
>>
>>     P +61 2 9009 5000,  Wwww.lisasoft.com <http://www.lisasoft.com>,  F +61 2 9009 5099
>>
>>
>>     This mail was received via Mail-SeCure System.
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Live-demo mailing list
>>     Live-demo at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Live-demo at lists.osgeo.org>
>>     http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/live-demo
>>     http://live.osgeo.org
>>     http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Live_GIS_Disc
>>     This mail was received via Mail-SeCure System.
>
>     Micha Silver
>     Arava Drainage Authority
>     +972-523-665918
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Discuss mailing list
>     Discuss at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Discuss at lists.osgeo.org>
>     http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
> -- 
> -- 
> Jody Garnett

-- 
Cameron Shorter,
Software and Data Solutions Manager
LISAsoft
Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf,
26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009

P +61 2 9009 5000,  W www.lisasoft.com,  F +61 2 9009 5099

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/osgeolive/attachments/20160203/edff459e/attachment.html>