[Live-demo] Notebook-review

[Angelos Tzotsos]

Hi Massimo,

I agree that we need a review process for all notebooks (not just GSoC).

+1
Angelos

On 03/14/2016 01:11 AM, massimo di stefano wrote:
>  From the discussion we had so far it is clear to me we need a *official revision procedure* to have the work done for the GSoC integrated into the live.
>
> I agreed in “hiding”  the jupyter notebook, and so the GSoC work, from this release of the Live,
> in favor of a transparent public commitment to review the efforts done.
>
> IMHO the spreadsheet approach we use for project review doesn’t apply very well in this context.
> To facilitate keeping track of the review and facilitate potential new contributors,
> I propose to open a motion in accepting the use of github checklist+issue tracker to keep track of the review process.
>
> I started this page, which should help in making this possible:
>
> https://github.com/epifanio/OSGeoLive-Notebooks/wiki/Notebook-review <https://github.com/epifanio/OSGeoLive-Notebooks/wiki/Notebook-review> <https://github.com/epifanio/OSGeoLive-Notebooks/wiki/Notebook-review <https://github.com/epifanio/OSGeoLive-Notebooks/wiki/Notebook-review>>
>
> We can improve it making it more clear, but should give you the idea.
>
> This motion is to validate the work done during GSoC, which is:
>
> “Development of educational material in the form of interactive notebooks”
>
> and to help the coordination between potential contributors for this specific topic.
>
>
>
> Here it is my +1
>
>
> Cheers,
> Massimo.
>
>


-- 
Angelos Tzotsos, PhD
OSGeo Charter Member
http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos