[Live-demo] Translations and Proj4 documentation

Thu Jun 15 14:15:18 PDT 2017

Hi Vicky,

I am downloading the 10.5 iso in order to make the test.

I had a look to pgRouting's quickstart, and made a very few change : are
you agree to be proj4's quickstart's reviewer ?

Regards,
Julien.

2017-06-14 20:29 GMT+02:00 Julien Moquet <moquet.julien at gmail.com>:

> Hi Vicky,
>
> I am not in the incubating list as a human being, but metacrs is :
> http://www.osgeo.org/incubator
>
>
> I'll have a look on pgRouting.
>
> Regards,
> Julien.
>
>
> 2017-06-14 3:02 GMT+02:00 Vicky Vergara <vicky at georepublic.de>:
>
>> Hello Julien,
>>
>> Now about the documentation
>> I see you've worked on your fork, these are the differences:
>> is that correct?
>> https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive-doc/compare/master...julien2512:master
>>
>> I dont think you are incubating project (I dont see it in the list of
>> incubating projects), so this might not apply.
>>
>> .. image:: ../../images/logos/OSGeo_incubation.png
>>   :scale: 100 %
>>   :alt: OSGeo Project
>>   :align: right
>>   :target: http://www.osgeo.org/incubator/process/principles.html
>>
>> 
>> But I see you advanced a lot on the documentation 👍
>> You might as well do the PR so that the other members of the team can
>> give you feed back.
>>
>> Vicky.
>> 
>> PS, in pgRouting   the documentation is done in such a way, to make
>> minimal changes in further releases of OSGeo Live.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Julien Moquet <moquet.julien at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Vicky,
>>>
>>> My fork is up to date regarding the overview and quickstart:
>>> https://github.com/julien2512/OSGeoLive-doc
>>>
>>> Before making a pull request, I need to test it over the OsGeoLive-10.5
>>> (on wednesday or thursday).
>>>
>>> Although, as I read the sources.list include in this version, I don't
>>> really think the latest proj4 will be used.
>>> The ubuntugis is used for that, and there is only the stable 4.8.0-3
>>> proj4 release to be used.
>>> See : http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntugis/ubuntugis-unstable/ubuntu
>>> /pool/main/p/proj/
>>> and https://github.com/OSGeo/OSGeoLive/blob/osgeolive_10_5/sourc
>>> es.list.d/ubuntugis.list
>>>
>>> That's why I finally don't have to change the proj4 release on its
>>> overview.
>>> I only bypass the metacrs and stuff.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Julien.
>>>
>>>
>>> 2017-06-11 18:11 GMT+02:00 Vicky Vergara <vicky at georepublic.de>:
>>>
>>>> Hi Julien, et all
>>>> Maybe you can help me.
>>>> It so happened that I sent another mail asking about what version to
>>>> use, while reviewing today, I saw that I didn't send the mail to proj4.
>>>> (my mail merge skills are not so good)
>>>>
>>>> So, here is the hand made mail:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> With the upcoming OSGeo-Live 11.0 reboot, we will be re-inserting each
>>>> project into the OSGeo-Live baseline once someone from each project has
>>>> replied to confirm that they have reviewed docs and verified the
>>>> application works as expected.
>>>>
>>>> Can you please:
>>>>  0. Reply by return email to confirm that you have recieved this email
>>>> and that you are able to check docs within the next 2 weeks. (sooner would
>>>> be better if you can)
>>>>  1. Reply to confirm the Project Overview is still accurate, or has
>>>> been updated, (and version numbers are correct)
>>>>  2. Reply to confirm you have run a recent OSGeo-Live version (the
>>>> previous 10.5 version is ok), and updated the quickstart where needed.
>>>>  We understand that version 4.9.2 of proj4 will be installed on
>>>> OSGeo-Live 11.0 (Version 4.9.2 was installed on OSGeo-Live 10.5.)
>>>> (all in one reply is ok)
>>>>
>>>> Full package status can be seen here:
>>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Q5BaEgQtgw4O1bXyeWMl
>>>> M8XtAOhUgcjZ7Y2O0FZc2H0/edit?hl=en_GB#gid=2014800150
>>>>
>>>> Key Milestones
>>>> -------------------
>>>> 18-Jun-2017    All docs reviewed and verified
>>>> 21-Jun-2017    OSGeo-Live delivered to UAT (final application versions
>>>> installed - Beta stage)
>>>> 24-Jul-2017    OSGeo-Live Final ISO
>>>> 14-Aug-2017 FOSS4G 2017 Boston
>>>>
>>>> ... full schedule http://spreadsheets.google.com
>>>> /ccc?key=0Al9zh8DjmU_RdE1SYUN3YWJ2N1NpSUczbW9IRWZNclE&hl=en_GB
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Cameron Shorter <
>>>> cameron.shorter at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Julien,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for offering to help with translations. I'm looping in Niko and
>>>>> Vicky who are currently wrestling with trying to get transifex to work. If
>>>>> you are familiar with it, you might be able to help them.
>>>>>
>>>>> Warm regards, Cameron
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2/6/17 3:22 am, Julien Moquet wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> >> It would be ok to say "Proj4 has been translated into other
>>>>> languages, including proj4js, ..."
>>>>> > Agreed that metacrs is probably a bit too ..
>>>>>
>>>>> I am fully agree too.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And as OsGeoLive aims to be multilanguages, I can help on the proj4
>>>>> French Translation pages.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2017-05-31 22:15 GMT+02:00 Even Rouault <even.rouault at spatialys.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On jeudi 1 juin 2017 05:57:38 CEST Cameron Shorter wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > Hi Evan,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > Yes, MetaCRS was a project gathering all the Proj4 projects
>>>>>> together.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > However, it appears that proj4 is the only project in that grouping
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > which is active?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > Hence my thoughts are that "MetaCRS" should be dropped from
>>>>>> OSGeo-Live
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > as a concept and "Proj4" be used instead. It would be ok to say
>>>>>> "Proj4
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > has been translated into other languages, including proj4js, ..."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > Your thoughts are welcome.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regarding what is listed currently in metacrs :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - proj4js: no opinion
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - cs-map: no-opinion
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - geotiff/libgeotiff: heavily used underneath by GDAL in particular,
>>>>>> mostly in maintaince mode, but can be treated as a technical dependency
>>>>>> that doesn't require to be visible from users.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - proj4j: no opinion
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - spatialreference.org: not maintained in years. http://epsg.io/
>>>>>> would be a possible replacement
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Agreed that metacrs is probably a bit too ... meta for folks
>>>>>> exploring OSGeo-Live content, so it could make sense exposing proj.4 as a
>>>>>> standalone project.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.spatialys.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Cameron Shorter
>>>>> M +61 419 142 254 <+61%20419%20142%20254>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
>>>> Salzmannstraße 44,
>>>> 81739 München, Germany
>>>>
>>>> Vicky Vergara
>>>> Operations Research
>>>>
>>>> eMail: vicky at georepublic.de
>>>> Web: https://georepublic.info
>>>>
>>>> Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1
>>>> Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9
>>>>
>>>> Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428
>>>> CEO: Daniel Kastl
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Georepublic UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
>> Salzmannstraße 44,
>> 81739 München, Germany
>>
>> Vicky Vergara
>> Operations Research
>>
>> eMail: vicky at georepublic.de
>> Web: https://georepublic.info
>>
>> Tel: +49 (089) 4161 7698-1
>> Fax: +49 (089) 4161 7698-9
>>
>> Commercial register: Amtsgericht München, HRB 181428
>> CEO: Daniel Kastl
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/osgeolive/attachments/20170615/3950d08d/attachment.html>