[OSGeoLive] [KRIHS] QuickStart/Manual for UN OSGeo Challenge 2
Angelos Tzotsos
gcpp.kalxas at gmail.com
Wed Apr 4 12:19:27 PDT 2018
Dear HaeKyong,
Thank you for reaching out to this list.
Please let us know if we can help you in the process.
Best regards,
Angelos
On 04/04/2018 11:16 AM, HaeKyong Kang wrote:
> Dear Angelos and all
>
>
> Regarding to quickstart/manuals of UN OSGeo Challenge 2: GeoAnalysis--it will be
> prepared by around the end of April 2018 (or earlier). I will send you a link
> when it will be ready.
>
>
> If you need hands for documentation of the Challenge 2, three mentors of the
> Challenge 2(Prof. D.H Cho, Mr. Minpa Lee, HaeKyong Kang) will be pleased to support.
>
>
> PS. Sorry for my late response because of my business trip.
>
> Best regards,
>
> HaeKyong Kang
>
> -----------
>
> Research Fellow
>
> Geospatial Information Researchc Division
>
> Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements
>
> www.krihs.re.kr
>
> T 82 044 960 0405
>
> F 82 044 211 4776
>
> H 82 010 2033 5998
>
> Skype somakang1
>
>
>
> ---------- *원본 메일* ----------
> *보낸사람*: "Angelos Tzotsos" <gcpp.kalxas at gmail.com>
> *받는사람*: "live-demo" <live-demo at lists.osgeo.org>
> *참조*: "Cameron Shorter" <cameron.shorter at gmail.com>, "un at lists.osgeo.org"
> <un at lists.osgeo.org>, "Haekyong" <hkkang at krihs.re.kr>, "Serena Coetzee"
> <serenacoetzee at gmail.com>, "Christina Hupy" <chupy at boundlessgeo.com>, "Maria
> Antonia Brovelli" <maria.brovelli at polimi.it>
> *날짜*: 2018-03-30 (금) 17:34:30
> *제목*: Re: [UN] UN OSGeo Challenge
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> We had a short discussion about this topic 2 weeks ago in our weekly
> OSGeoLive meeting, where we asked for volunteers to mentor this initiative.
>
> As a result of those challenges for OSGeoLive I would see:
> 1. Some updated quickstarts (e.g. GeoNode which is the code base of GeoShape)
> 2. New workshop materials being added in the wiki we publish, along with
> their data.
>
> Any volunteers for helping out as mentors for the documentation?
>
> Best,
> Angelos
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 12:26 AM, Maria Antonia Brovelli
> <maria.brovelli at polimi.it <mailto:maria.brovelli at polimi.it>> wrote:
>
> Dear Cameron
> Yes, we already presented the initiative to Angelos and Astrid.
> Many thanks for the suggestions.
> About the criteria
> 1) being charter member is not mandatory; everybody can apply. On the
> other side charter members are people who were awarded with this title
> and we believe that it is worth to be considered.
> 2) we want to have young people but with experience in education and
> training as they have to produce this kind of material.
> I believe there are many good candidates and the competition will be
> very high.
>
> Thanks a lot also for the typos that we will correct.
> Best,
> Maria
>
>
>
>
> Inviato dal mio dispositivo Samsung
> -------- Messaggio originale --------
> Da: Cameron Shorter <cameron.shorter at gmail.com
> <mailto:cameron.shorter at gmail.com>>
> Data: 29/03/18 22:08 (GMT+01:00)
> A: un at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:un at lists.osgeo.org>, live-demo
> <live-demo at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:live-demo at lists.osgeo.org>>, Angelos
> Tzotsos <gcpp.kalxas at gmail.com <mailto:gcpp.kalxas at gmail.com>>
> Oggetto: Re: [UN] UN OSGeo Challenge
>
> Maria, OSGeo UN Committee, OSGeoLive team,
>
> Great initiative, I'm very supportive.
>
> I'm excited to see OSGeoLive engaged prominently in the criteria. I
> think that OSGeoLive has the potential to be a great asset to the
> education community and this is an excellent initiative to fast track this.
>
> Have you been talking with someone from the OSGeoLive team about the
> practical implementation? (Angelos would be a good start). There are a
> few things that I think need to be thought through:
>
> * OSGeoLive is currently space constrained to our distribution medium.
> Typically a 4 Gig or 8 Gig USB. Large teaching datasets could cause us
> challenges. We have options to address this, but it is something we
> should consider up front.
>
> * OSGeoLive has remained a healthy project for 8 years in part because
> we have ensured our cost of maintenance doesn't exceed our volunteer
> capacity. We need to think through how can maintain any material
> created, and how we can keep maintenance requirements to a minimum.
>
> Re: evaluation criteria:
>
> On 29/3/18 10:45 pm, Maria Antonia Brovelli wrote:
> >
> > Evaluation criteria:
> >
> > 1. Proposer is an OSGeo Charter Member
> >
> * I'd suggest this be changed to "has demonstrable experience within the
> OSGeo community". One of our best technical contributors to OSGeoLive,
> who regularly also gave great council, as well as writing very good
> documentation, was someone who shunned titles and has never signed up to
> be an OSGeo Charter member. (As I write this, I think he'd be a good
> candidate for this project - if he could be tempted). There are others
> like him. They shouldn't be excluded from applying.
> On the other hand, there are some OSGeo Charter members who have done
> little after joining. I believe creating a "honey-pot" will lead to
> people applying for charter membership for personal benefit instead of
> altruistic reasons.
> >
> > 1. Proposer’s age (20 if < 40 years old; 0 if >40 years old)
> >
> * I question the purpose of this? If you are trying to increase young
> people applying, then an age break at 40 doesn't help the struggling end
> of the age spectrum. (I'd be more inclined to make a break at say 25).
> I think you will find older people, will self select themselves out
> based on their typically higher pay grade.
> I'd be inclined to remove this criteria all together.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Angelos Tzotsos, PhD
> OSGeo Charter Member
> http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos
>
>
--
Angelos Tzotsos, PhD
Charter Member
Open Source Geospatial Foundation
http://users.ntua.gr/tzotsos
More information about the Osgeolive
mailing list