[pdal] [pgpointcloud] ply and laz

[Andrew Bell]

I don't see how any of this pertains to the original issue.  The pipeline
was using binary, not text output.  I'm writing some tests for the data
that were missing in the original implementation.

On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Rémi Cura <remi.cura at gmail.com> wrote:

> I don't know,
> I use the ascii output to stream into the postgres server,
> and the reduced precision was making me loose a digit in precision.
>
> That was before pdal could read/write ply =)
>
> All in all, ascii ply format is awfully under-constrained...
>
> Cheers,
> Rémi-C
>
> 2015-09-28 16:39 GMT+02:00 Howard Butler <howard at hobu.co>:
>
>> Was there any consequence for other PLY readers? We could happily merge
>> that if it isn't externally disruptive.
>>
>> Howard
>>
>> > On Sep 28, 2015, at 9:37 AM, Rémi Cura <remi.cura at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > I changed it to
>> > %.16g
>> >
>> https://github.com/Remi-C/Pointcloud_in_db/blob/master/RPly_Ubuntu/src/rply.c#L1340
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pdal mailing list
> pdal at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pdal
>



-- 
Andrew Bell
andrew.bell.ia at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/pdal/attachments/20150928/58d6c8ea/attachment.html>