[pgrouting-dev] Support for Time Constraints
Jay Mahadeokar
jai.mahadeokar at gmail.com
Thu Apr 7 12:35:12 EDT 2011
Hello all,
Just an update - as Daniel suggested I posted a query about time-Dependent
data in OSM routing list. It seems they dont have such data, but people have
posted some things that might be useful for us in future. Here is link to
the discussion -
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/routing/2011-April/001127.html
You may want to have a look there.
Sorry for the delayed replies, presently, I am a bit occupied by college
submissions. I will go through the links and the ideas proposed here by
Daniel and Steve soon. As already said I guess we need to put a lot of
thought in designing the data model, that would be easy for users to use,
robust and flexible for different applications, and at the same time
efficient in terms of query and processing time. I will try and come up with
thoughts on that soon.
Regarding Navteq data, the website says that only one data-set will be
allowed to download. So, I was wondering which data should be preferred.
Also, there are various data-formats that Navteq provides data in. Steve,
have you downloaded any data which specifically has time-dependent edge
weights?
Though we will not want the module to follow Navteq standards, any
time-dependent data would be very helpful for me, since I also want to try
out some heuristics on that as part of my thesis. The work done by R.
Geisberger, P. Sanders and others is experimented on the Germany data
provided by PTV AG http://www.ptvag.com/company/contact/. I have requested
them data for research purposes. Have you worked with their data by any
chance?
Regards,
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Stephen Woodbridge
<woodbri at swoodbridge.com>wrote:
> On 4/5/2011 1:37 AM, Daniel Kastl wrote:
>
>> Hi Jay,
>>
>> As Steve said, Navteq sample data is one possibility ... and it's better
>> than nothing ;-)
>>
>> Well, I think we should avoid to support a single data provider, because
>> who tells that the format they defined several years ago is the most
>> suitable one. It might work perfectly for Navteq and road networks in
>> countries they are operating, but this doesn't say there won't be a more
>> clever way to store such an information.
>> I think it will be always necessary to transform data into a format
>> pgRouting algorithms can handle. So it's OK in my opinion to define some
>> convenient format if there isn't an existing standard already (which
>> doesn't exist afaik).
>> But Navteq is good data for testing, I agree. For the beginning I think
>> it might be even too complex model, as Steve mentioned there are even
>> time dependent turn restrictions.
>>
>
> I think that the value in looking at Navteq is not to use it all, but that
> it is a concrete data model that expresses all the various routing
> characteristics that you might run into in other data sets. Navteq has been
> the basis for almost all routing solution during the past 10-15 years. There
> are now others like TeleAtlas, and even OSM. So look it over and use as much
> or as little as you need to get started. Designing a data model is very
> complex and you can not do it in the abstract - you need to know what you
> are modeling.
>
> As far as defining an data model that is easy for users to work with, keep
> the tables simple to understand and load with data. It is better to have 5
> simple to work with tables than 1-2 complex ones. If you need to transform
> the data inside then have a preparation function that reads the user tables
> and applies them to the graph. So examples of user tables might be:
>
> o bus, train, ferry, airline schedules
> o live traffic data table
> o historical speed estimates by day/time (as Daniel mentions below)
> o transfer rules - required pre-deparature arrival time when transferring
> to a different transportation mode and post-scheduled arrival wait time when
> transferring from a mode. EG, must arrive at airport 2 hr before flight
> departure and allow 45 mins after arrival to collect baggage or longer on
> international flights. (this might not apply to your specific problem)
>
>
>
>
>
A good place to discuss such a question might be also the "OSM routing"
>> mailing list. In the worst case nobody will answer. But maybe you will
>> start a long discussion as there are several people very interested in
>> routing related topics. OSM data would be nice, if we could make use of
>> it, but I fear that not many mappers really think about
>> time-dependent attributes. Probably in Germany you can find such a data.
>>
>
> Yes, working with OSM is another good possibility.
>
>
> I thought a bit about some possible cases for time dependent road
>> networks:
>>
>> * In Japan a big issue for navigation software are so called "School
>> Zones", which are areas around schools obviously, which are closed
>> for motorized traffic at certain times in the morning.
>> * In Europe I know about pedestrian areas for example, which can be
>> used for delivery of goods after regular business hours. Or heavy
>> trucks are not allowed to access roads during certain times.
>> * Some highways/roads in Germany have a speed limit during night time
>> * Ferry services might only operate during day time (so if you
>> missed the last ferry, you might have to take a longer way)
>> * In Japan they have so called VICS data
>> (http://www.mlit.go.jp/road/ITS/conf/2006/ts20.pdf) collected from
>> road sensors, which can tell the typical speed on roads during
>> certain hours.
>>
>> ... and so on ...
>>
>
> One last thought on loading data. I work a lot with Navteq and LOTS of
> other data sets. The one common theme that I come back to is that I create
> data loaders for the various data sets I work with so I can load the data
> into the database and I always end up transforming the data into a simpler
> model that is easy to work with and then used by whatever application I am
> working on. Sometimes I transform the data in the loader and sometimes I
> just load it raw and transform it in the database and then drop the raw data
> tables.
>
> Hope this helps,
> -Steve
>
>
>> I think what pgRouting is currently missing are some sort of "unit
>> tests" on some test network. This can be a regular grid with costs
>> assigned, that model a certain routing case. It would be really
>> convenient to have something like this.
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> 2011/4/5 Jay Mahadeokar <jai.mahadeokar at gmail.com
>> <mailto:jai.mahadeokar at gmail.com>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Since we will be working on time-dependent shortest path problem, I
>> was wondering if time-dependent geographic data is freely available
>> for research purposes. [1] states that we witness an increasing
>> number of navigation service providers (such as Navteq and
>> TeleAtlas) have started releasing their time-dependent travel-time
>> datasets for road networks at high-resolution temporal granularity
>> as fine as one sample for every five minutes.
>>
>> I guess that data is not freely available. Anyways, if you know such
>> data-source can you please direct me? Besides this project, I am
>> also working on some new heuristics for time-dependent shortest path
>> as part of my thesis and the data would be really helpful for my work.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> [1] http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1869865
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Stephen Woodbridge
>> <woodbri at swoodbridge.com <mailto:woodbri at swoodbridge.com>> wrote:
>>
>> On 3/30/2011 9:45 PM, Daniel Kastl wrote:
>>
>>
>> float cost := getEdgeCost(time, vehicle_type,
>> node_from,
>> node_to);
>>
>> or something like that. Where time could be NULL
>> for some
>> default
>> behavior, or a value that would be used to
>> figure out the cost.
>> vehicle_type might be helpful if there are
>> multiple costs to
>> traverse a link based on say, car, carpool, bus,
>> truck, walking,
>> taxi, etc. This could also be used to implement
>> the rules
>> for bus
>> and train lines.
>>
>>
>> I think one of the difficulties with routing topic is that
>> everyone
>> (also myself) immediately think about routing in terms of
>> vehicle types.
>> It's the easiest example to explain pgRouting, but I think
>> one premise
>> of pgRouting is that it should work for any kind of network.
>> Let's say
>> your network would be the human nervous system. What is a
>> vehicle there?
>> Well, probably changing "vehicle_type" to "speed" would make
>> sense, right?
>>
>>
>> Sorry for using vehicle as the selector maybe "service_type"
>> would be better, but the point is not the name, "speed" is
>> equally misleading, the point is to be able to be able to pass a
>> selector to the under lying function so that based on the
>> selector we can compute an appropriate cost.
>>
>> For my vehicle routing example, I chose: car, carpool, bus,
>> truck, walking, taxi, etc. because these might have different
>> rules associated to them. The selector values would be
>> appropriate to the model that you were working with.
>>
>> car vs carpool vs bus - many cities have HOV lanes that bus and
>> carpool can use but not single occupancy cars. We might want to
>> allocate a higher speed to those lanes vs the normal lanes
>> during rush hours. Emergency vehicles many be allowed to make
>> u-turns on highways that other vehicles can not make. Trucks
>> might be banned from some streets so need to be costed
>> appropriately, etc.
>>
>> If we had a live traffic feed information linked to segment ids
>> in another table, The cost function could be implemented to
>> check that table and if a record exists then use that
>> information or return the standard information. By keeping this
>> data in a separate table that is presumably much smaller and
>> dynamic than the street records it would make it much easier and
>> more cost effective to make dynmaic changes to that table and to
>> hide (abstract away complexity) by using a cost function
>> supplied to the underlying code.
>>
>> -Steve
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pgrouting-dev mailing list
>> pgrouting-dev at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:
>> pgrouting-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>>
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> -Jay Mahadeokar
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pgrouting-dev mailing list
>> pgrouting-dev at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:pgrouting-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>>
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Georepublic UG & Georepublic Japan
>> eMail: daniel.kastl at georepublic.de <mailto:daniel.kastl at georepublic.de>
>> Web: http://georepublic.de <http://georepublic.de/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pgrouting-dev mailing list
>> pgrouting-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pgrouting-dev mailing list
> pgrouting-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-dev
>
--
Regards,
-Jay Mahadeokar
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/pgrouting-dev/attachments/20110407/24e7e202/attachment-0001.html
More information about the pgrouting-dev
mailing list