[pgrouting-dev] [postgis-devel] 2.1 beta status Vote: +1

[Paragon Corporation]

 Devrim,

I'd love to.  Does it require it to be feature complete though or does it
not have to be feature complete for beta?
  I think we are more or less feature complete at this point. 

But need to verify with 

Strk,prasmey,dustymugs, pracine, colivier they don't have too much left
outstanding and PSC has to vote of course too.

But I'm giving my official +1 .


I've got some loose ends to tie up with tiger geocoder, but that is more of
a side extra anyway and not part of core PostGIS.


And Devrim -- since you now package pgRouting as well -- may want to talk
with pgRouting folks. Would be nice to have that tested alongside 9.3.  I
haven't had a chance to test pgRouting  1.07 on 9.3 yet, but planning to and
also to package for 9.3 beta.  I suspect pgRouting 2.0 won't be ready before
9.3 comes out.

Steve -- thoughts?  I've also cc'd pgRouting development so Daniel et.al can
chime in.

Thanks,
Regina

-----Original Message-----
From: postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2013 2:40 PM
To: PostGIS Development Discussion
Subject: [postgis-devel] 2.1 beta status


Hi,

Per
http://www.postgresonline.com/journal/archives/303-Which-PostGIS-should-you-
use-with-PostgreSQL-9.3.html

and given that PostgreSQL 9.3 will go beta sometime next week, I think we
need 2.1 beta for testers. Are you planning to release beta1 before
PostgreSQL 9.3 beta?

Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danismani/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org  Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz