[pgrouting-dev] Adding stackexchange to our support channels
Stephen Woodbridge
woodbri at swoodbridge.com
Fri Oct 4 07:16:50 PDT 2013
Ha! you are way ahead of me as usual. Thanks.
On 10/4/2013 9:28 AM, Daniel Kastl wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Stephen Woodbridge
> <woodbri at swoodbridge.com <mailto:woodbri at swoodbridge.com>> wrote:
>
> Any thoughts on doing this for pgRouting?
>
>
> I thought we already do this:
> http://pgrouting.org/support.html
> http://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/pgrouting
>
> ... at least I'm answering there from time to time.
>
> Daniel
>
>
>
> On 10/4/2013 6:32 AM, thomas bonfort wrote:
>
> Hi MapServer Users and Power-Users,
>
> As FrankW pointed out during our FOSS4G presentation, I would
> like to
> propose that we add stackexchange as an "official" support
> channel for
> MapServer. You can check and subscribe to mapserver related
> questions
> here: http://stackexchange.com/__filters/90617/mapserver
> <http://stackexchange.com/filters/90617/mapserver>
>
> Why?
>
> - Stackexchange questions and answers are very well referenced
> through
> search engines, which would avoid recurring questions from being
> brought up on the mailing list
> - The answers get up or down-voted by the community, allowing a user
> to immediately flesh out relevant information for a given question
> - Asking a question on stack-exchange might help new users to
> seek for
> help, instead of having to subscribe and post to a public
> mailing list
> (which can be intimidating)
>
> How?
>
> - By referencing stackexchange in our "getting help"
> documentation section
> - Most importantly, by having MapServer power users subscribe and
> participate to the stackexchange questions, providing answers or
> upvoting correct existing answers.
>
> Users, is this something that you would find beneficial?
> Power-users, would you be willing to participate to another support
> channel, knowing that in the long run the aim is to reduce your
> workload as the most common questions will answer themselves ?
> PSC, should we have some kind of motion to vote and officialise
> this?
>
> best regards,
> Thomas
> _________________________________________________
> mapserver-dev mailing list
> mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:mapserver-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
> http://lists.osgeo.org/__mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev
> <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/mapserver-dev>
>
>
> _________________________________________________
> pgrouting-dev mailing list
> pgrouting-dev at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:pgrouting-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
> http://lists.osgeo.org/__mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-dev
> <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-dev>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Georepublic UG & Georepublic Japan
> eMail: daniel.kastl at georepublic.de <mailto:daniel.kastl at georepublic.de>
> Web: http://georepublic.de <http://georepublic.de/>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pgrouting-dev mailing list
> pgrouting-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-dev
>
More information about the pgrouting-dev
mailing list