[pgrouting-dev] GSoC 2020 - Lengauer Tarjan dominator Tree and Two graphs common Spanning Trees for pgRouting - Weekly Report [Week 9]
Prakash Tiwari
85prakash2017 at gmail.com
Sun Aug 2 08:35:06 PDT 2020
Hello Everyone,
This is my weekly report for week [9] (Jul 27th - Aug 2nd). The report can
also be found in the project wiki [1].
What did I get done this week?
- Created the pull request in which my weekly progress can be reviewed.
[2]
- Completed the GSoC second evaluation.
- Completed the pgTap tests of pgr_bipartite which includes
- no_crash_test.sql
- inner-query.sql
- types-check.sql
- edges-sql.sql
- Prepare user documentation with additional example of pgr_bipartite.
- Renamed files of pgTap tests according to mentor suggationa.
- Refined the code of c++ files.
-
- What do I plan on doing next week?
-
Refine and review the code of implemented algorithms.
-
Add more pgTap tests of pgr_bipartite and
pgr_lengauer_tarjan_dominator_tree
-
Prepare user documentation with additional example of pgr_bipartite and
pgr_lengauer_tarjan_dominator_tree.
Blocking Issues
It is not a blocking of pgRouting. But I found the problem in
boost::two_graph_common_spanning_trees it was not returning the output as
they were expected, So I mailed the issue to the boost mailing list
regarding this. As they will response I will continue with my rest of
coding part. Till then I started working in my next function (After
discussing with mentors)that is bipartite it was an additional idea.
Meetings attended in this week
No meeting was scheduled.
Thanks
Prakash Tiwari
links:
[1].
https://github.com/pgRouting/pgrouting/wiki/GSoC-2020-Lengauer-Tarjan-dominator-tree-and-Two-graphs-common-Spanning-Trees
[2]. https://github.com/pgRouting/GSoC-pgRouting/pull/112
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/pgrouting-dev/attachments/20200802/c26f87c8/attachment.html>
More information about the pgrouting-dev
mailing list