[pgrouting-dev] PSC Motion: Move pgrouting.org under OSGeo domain

[Cayetano Benavent]

+1 It's better to be under OSGeo's control.

On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 9:35 AM Rajat Shinde <rajatshinde2303 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> That's a good proposal.
>
> +1 Rajat
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 9:59 AM Regina Obe <lr at pcorp.us> wrote:
>
>> As part of incubation, we will create a pgrouting.osgeo.org to redirect
>> to
>> pgRouting.org
>> Which I have ticketed here -
>> https://github.com/pgRouting/admin/issues/44
>>
>> By convention, OSGeo generally owns the domain of each OSGeo project and
>> is
>> responsible for keeping up with the payment of the domain.
>>
>> That said, while in incubation or after we complete incubation, we should
>> move pgRouting.org to OSGeo.
>>
>> This will prevent the issue of the 1-bus factor.
>>
>> +1  Regina to move pgrouting.org under OSGeo control.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Regina
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pgrouting-dev mailing list
>> pgrouting-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> pgrouting-dev mailing list
> pgrouting-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-dev
>


-- 
*Cayetano Benavent*

+34 954 095 876 | cayetano at carto.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/pgrouting-dev/attachments/20230302/ee758df6/attachment.htm>