[pgrouting-users] postgis 2.0 and postgresql 9.1

[Sanak]

Hi Stephen Woodbridge, Organization Members,
Thanks for your reply.
I didn't noticed about "extension",
and release 2.0 really include lot of TODOs...

So, if windows 64bit demand is large and in a hurry,
I will try mingw 64bit build at first for quick approach,
and later try msvc(Microsoft Visual Studio C++) 64bit build for release 2.0.
(msvc approach will be require many source(.h/.c/.cpp) changes,
because of poor C99 support .etc, and it's no longer packaging issue.)

mingw-diff : https://github.com/sanak/pgrouting/compare/master...mingw
msvc-diff : https://github.com/sanak/pgrouting/compare/master...msvc

Windows msvc build advantages is as follows.
1. PostgreSQL 8.4+ itself has been build with msvc8+.
2. Process debbuging is possible. (see
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Getting_a_stack_trace_of_a_running_PostgreSQL_backend_on_Windows
 )
3. More easier development and crash investigation.

But, those advantages may be useful only Windows enterprise user or
developer.

Regards,

 2012/6/8 Stephen Woodbridge <woodbri at swoodbridge.com>

> We currently do not have a plan for a release. In fact we do not have a
> developer that can do the release. I have spent a little bit of time trying
> to identify what needs to be done, but have had no time to work on it
> beyond the little bit of planning I have done.
>
> I would agree that 2.0 should be targeted at PostgreSQL 9.x and PostGIS
> 2.0+ which probably means we should look into the new postgresql
>  CREATE EXTENSION pgrouting;
> system for installation.
>
> If any developer(s) would like to step up to this task or any of the
> release tasks, I'm willing to help out and share the effort and make sure
> we have come continuity of effort.
>
> And as Daniel commented funding or sponsorship could help. The TRSP
> routing was customer funded and the core code development was done under
> contract by Ashraf (aka: Roni) in Bangladesh, a former GSoC student.
>
> Or eventually, I will have to upgrade my systems to Postgresql 9+ and
> postGIS 2.0+ and be forced to figure this out in self-defense :)
>
> Best regards,
>  -Steve
>
>
> On 6/7/2012 8:48 AM, Sanak wrote:
>
>> Hi Pieter, Recardo,
>> Thanks for quick response!
>> Hi Daniel, Organization Members,
>> Because PostGIS Windows 64 bit installer support only ver2.0+,
>> so it may be better that pgRouting Windows 64 bit binary support only
>> ver2.0+,
>> but, is there 2.0 release plan?
>> (I guess that 2.0 release include TRSP to core, Shooting Star to extra,
>> Unit test .etc)
>> And can I join release 2.0 development(mainly Windows 64 bit porting)?
>> 2012/6/7 Daniel Kastl <daniel at georepublic.de <mailto:
>> daniel at georepublic.de>**>
>>
>>
>>    PS: You can contact Sanak directly or you can donate to pgRouting
>>    project and we will forward the sponsorship to him.
>>
>> Latter is better for me, because I am not so good at English. (I always
>> use translation site)
>> And I hope that appropriate donation to pgRouting project exists.
>> Regards,
>>
>>    On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Ricardo Bayley
>>    <ricardo.bayley at gmail.com <mailto:ricardo.bayley at gmail.**com<ricardo.bayley at gmail.com>>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>        likewise
>>        +1 for a pgrouting windows 64bit
>>
>>        2012/6/6 Pieter du Plooy <pjduplooy at zpanelcp.com
>>        <mailto:pjduplooy at zpanelcp.com**>>
>>
>>
>>            Hi guys
>>
>>            My first post here, and just to say +1 from me for a 64 bit
>>            Windows build of pgrouting.
>>
>>            Regards
>>
>>            Pieter
>>
>>            ______________________________**_________________
>>            Pgrouting-users mailing list
>>            Pgrouting-users at lists.osgeo.**org<Pgrouting-users at lists.osgeo.org>
>>            <mailto:Pgrouting-users at lists.**osgeo.org<Pgrouting-users at lists.osgeo.org>
>> >
>>
>>            http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-**users<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users>
>>
>>
>>
>>        ______________________________**_________________
>>        Pgrouting-users mailing list
>>        Pgrouting-users at lists.osgeo.**org<Pgrouting-users at lists.osgeo.org>
>>        <mailto:Pgrouting-users at lists.**osgeo.org<Pgrouting-users at lists.osgeo.org>
>> >
>>
>>        http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-**users<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>    --
>>    Georepublic UG & Georepublic Japan
>>    eMail: daniel.kastl at georepublic.de <mailto:daniel.kastl@**
>> georepublic.de <daniel.kastl at georepublic.de>>
>>    Web: http://georepublic.de <http://georepublic.de/>
>>
>>    ______________________________**_________________
>>    Pgrouting-users mailing list
>>    Pgrouting-users at lists.osgeo.**org <Pgrouting-users at lists.osgeo.org><mailto:
>> Pgrouting-users at lists.**osgeo.org <Pgrouting-users at lists.osgeo.org>>
>>
>>    http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-**users<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Pgrouting-users mailing list
>> Pgrouting-users at lists.osgeo.**org <Pgrouting-users at lists.osgeo.org>
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-**users<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users>
>>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Pgrouting-users mailing list
> Pgrouting-users at lists.osgeo.**org <Pgrouting-users at lists.osgeo.org>
> http://lists.osgeo.org/**mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-**users<http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/pgrouting-users/attachments/20120608/a98df50c/attachment.html>