[pgrouting-users] pgr_maxFlow

[Dave Potts]

HiSo its a workable function, but there may be bugs in it!

>From a look at the source code, it seems that most of work is done by the
boost library and any possible errors would be in the calling interface
which is a mixture of C/C++

On 25 September 2017 at 09:21, Daniel Kastl <daniel at georepublic.de> wrote:

> Hi Dave,
>
> The function is listed as "stable proposed", and the info box on top
> explains a bit, what we mean with this:
> http://docs.pgrouting.org/latest/en/proposed.html#stable
>
> Often those functions are ready, but they are missing some extra work on
> tests or documentation for example.
> Or they have been developed during GSoC, and we hope to get some feedback
> from real-world use cases.
> Maybe by "hiding" these functions a bit, only few people find and try
> them. But feedback is actually what we hope for.
>
> pgr_maxFlow falls into the GSoC category, and some feedback would be great!
>
> Best regards,
> Daniel
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Dave Potts <mrdapotts at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Great news on getting version 2.5 out
>>
>> Looking around the documentation I have noticed the function pgr_maxFlow,
>> its only listed as a proposed function.
>>
>> Just how stable is it ?  Was it ever finished ?  Does it work?
>>
>>
>> regards
>>
>>
>> Dave.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pgrouting-users mailing list
>> Pgrouting-users at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Georepublic UG & Georepublic Japan
> eMail: daniel.kastl at georepublic.de
> Web: https://georepublic.info
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pgrouting-users mailing list
> Pgrouting-users at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/pgrouting-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/pgrouting-users/attachments/20170925/74d3f6e4/attachment.html>