[postgis-devel] OGC WKB/T - PGIS EWKB/T
Markus Schaber
schabios at logi-track.com
Thu Dec 23 04:09:32 PST 2004
Hi, Martin,
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 11:48:09 -0000
"Martin Daly" <Martin.Daly at cadcorp.com> wrote:
> > Is remember having stumbled over this document earlier, but I
> > always regarded it as proposal. Is it really approved, and
> > thus an official spec?
>
> This is part of an e-mail from Kurt Buehler, sent to the OGC Simple
> Features for COM Working Group on 6th September, 1999:
>
> > Finally, Adam's Z-value revision 99-402r2 passed.
> > It can still be obtained at:
> > https://feature.opengis.org/members/archive/99-402r2.doc
> > https://feature.opengis.org/members/archive/99-402r2.pdf
> > https://feature.opengis.org/members/archive/99-402r2.ps
> > https://feature.opengis.org/members/archive/99-402r2.rtf
Great!
> Those URLs are now 404's, the member area having been replaced by the
> portal. I will chase OGC up about making the document more public.
Thanks.
> The only WKBZ-aware implementations that I know of are ours, Safe
> Software's FME, and Frank Warmerdam's OGR.
And they all adhere to the above standard? Cool. A standard that
actually works, has not too much incompatible rivaling standards, and is
adopted. I always thought such things do not exist :-)
> > However, we still have to convince the OGC to adopt our
> > interpretation of M values.
>
> I suggest that you and/or Refractions draft a change request proposal
> based on 99-402, to extend WKB and WKT to include M and ZM. Cadcorp, as
> an OGC Technical Committee member, would be willing to act as the
> submitter.
I think I'll get the permission to do this at work, but I cannot promise
anything before the end of January.
Thanks for your willingness to submit it,
Markus
--
markus schaber | dipl. informatiker
logi-track ag | rennweg 14-16 | ch 8001 zürich
phone +41-43-888 62 52 | fax +41-43-888 62 53
mailto:schabios at logi-track.com | www.logi-track.com
More information about the postgis-devel
mailing list