[postgis-devel] GEOS Interfaces

[strk]

On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 10:30:30AM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> True enough. However, one of the things I heard from several people at 
> MUM was that our 0.X numbering scheme was hindering adoption 
> psycologically with decision makers. We have been running large 
> productions on PostGIS for years now, time to get to 1.0. :)

Why not PostGIS 2004 ;)
Really, I'm sure postgis 'deserves' >0 Major Version Number.
--strk;

> 
> strk wrote:
> 
> >On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 09:55:41AM -0700, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> >
> >>Strk,
> >>Now that you have broken backward compatibility with the new GEOS 
> >>interfaces, does the CVS postgis work against the CVS geos? From a 
> >>release PoV I would like to do a PostGIS 1.0 / GEOS 1.4 release that are 
> >>mutually compatible.
> >>Paul
> >
> >
> >Yes, this is what I wrote in my previous mail.
> >Postgis will work with GEOS-1.0 *and* GEOS-1.4.
> >
> >BTW: GEOS code is still young. IMO it shouldn't have taken version 1.0
> >     as the interface consistency issue was already known.
> >
> >--strk;
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >postgis-devel mailing list
> >postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> >http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
> 
> 
> -- 
>       __
>      /
>      | Paul Ramsey
>      | Refractions Research
>      | Email: pramsey at refractions.net
>      | Phone: (250) 885-0632
>      \_
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel