[postgis-devel] 1.0RC1 open issues
strk at refractions.net
strk at refractions.net
Fri Jan 7 10:33:05 PST 2005
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 01:17:33PM +0100, Markus Schaber wrote:
> Hi, Strk,
>
> On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 11:04:43 +0100
> strk at refractions.net wrote:
>
> > - && Operator for geometry and box2d
> > one of the two might be useless while
> > having both doesn't let you query
> > geometry && box2d
> > because this could be transformed to
> > geometry && box2d::geometry
> > OR
> > geometry::box2d && box2d
> > .. and pGSQL can't choose between the two.
>
> Abandoning one of the auto casts would be bad, I think.
>
> Hmm, what does postgres do when we define "geometry && box2d" and "box2d
> && geometry" as well? Then it does not need to cast, and your code can
> do what is most efficient. The back side is that two additional
> operators have to be maintained.
>
> The lean alternative may be to only define it for box2d and always rely
> on the autocasts.
Ok. I've dropped their definition for box2d and kept them for
geometry. They are meant to be used for geometries, and GiST
index works on geometries, not box2d.
--strk;
>
> HTH,
> Markus
> --
> markus schaber | dipl. informatiker
> logi-track ag | rennweg 14-16 | ch 8001 zürich
> phone +41-43-888 62 52 | fax +41-43-888 62 53
> mailto:schabios at logi-track.com | www.logi-track.com
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
--
For standing up against patentability of software,
Thank You, Poland!
Read the intervention: http://kwiki.ffii.org/ConsPolon041221En
Send your thanks: thankyoupoland.info
Read/do more: http://www.noepatents.org/
More information about the postgis-devel
mailing list