[postgis-devel] Broken r-tree semantics in PostgreSQL (rtree_gistand rtree)

[Mark Cave-Ayland]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net 
> [mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On 
> Behalf Of strk at refractions.net
> Sent: 24 June 2005 13:37
> To: 'PostGIS Development Discussion'
> Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] Broken r-tree semantics in 
> PostgreSQL (rtree_gistand rtree)

(cut)

> Ok, I checked updates in pgsql and ported them to our 
> implementation. I've also ported use of internal_consistent 
> always (even for leaf
> nodes) as we also have a LOSSY specification (for SRID, but that is).
> 
> Regression tests work, but worked before as well (we lack a 
> test for this case)...
> 
> I committed the change in both head and 1.0 branches, do you 
> think I should port the code to 0.9 branch as well ?


Hi strk,

I'll try and look over the changes when I get a chance. Might be worth
posting it onto postgis-users and seeing what the general opinion is on
whether to port back to 0.9.


Kind regards,

Mark.

------------------------
WebBased Ltd
17 Research Way
Tamar Science Park
Plymouth
PL6 8BT 

T: +44 (0)1752 797131
F: +44 (0)1752 791023
W: http://www.webbased.co.uk