[postgis-devel] Google's issue's tracker
robe.dnd at cityofboston.gov
Tue Dec 2 13:50:29 PST 2008
Ah yes you are right? I guess I should have read the verbiage since the
term verified I found confusing.
Honestly though Fixed seems more final to me than Verified. I always
get confused between
Verified - does that mean the bug is reproducible or the fix is
verified to work. I always use Verified in context of issue is
reproducible, but we haven't decided if we care to fix it.
From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net
[mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 4:40 PM
To: PostGIS Development Discussion
Subject: [postgis-devel] Google's issue's tracker
Just a simple observation here regarding the Status field. Shouldn't
the final state of an issue be 'Verified' instead
of our commonly used 'Fixed' status? The 'Fixed' state indicates that a
QA will follow, implying that code-review, QA,
and testing are in progress.
postgis-devel mailing list
postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
The substance of this message, including any attachments, may be
confidential, legally privileged and/or exempt from disclosure
pursuant to Massachusetts law. It is intended
solely for the addressee. If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
More information about the postgis-devel