[postgis-devel] Rebranding proposal for SVN HEAD

[Obe, Regina]

I guess its fine as long as it doesn't break everything.

I've always been kind of confused by the lwpostgis.sql name since I keep
on looking for a postgis.sql.

As a side note:
I was hoping we would have a separate sql file for the function comments
though and was hoping to modify the postgis docs so that I we can have a
separate xsl file to tease the comments out of the docs into meta data
inserts.  More on that later.

With that said - postgis_core.sql, postgis_comments.sql or something
would make me slightly happier, but then again its not that much better.

Thanks,
Regina

-----Original Message-----
From: postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net
[mailto:postgis-devel-bounces at postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of Mark
Cave-Ayland
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 6:11 AM
To: PostGIS Development Discussion
Subject: [postgis-devel] Rebranding proposal for SVN HEAD

Hi everyone,

Given the restructuring that PostGIS has had in SVN HEAD, how would 
people feel about rebranding a few things? In particular, I'd like to 
rename the lwgeom/ directory to postgis/ now that we have a separate 
liblwgeom/ directory, plus how about renaming some of the existing files

so they don't contain "lw" references? For example:

	lwpostgis.sql -> postgis.sql
	liblwpostgis.so -> (lib)postgis.so

Does that sound sensible?


ATB,

Mark.

-- 
Mark Cave-Ayland
Sirius Corporation - The Open Source Experts
http://www.siriusit.co.uk
T: +44 870 608 0063
_______________________________________________
postgis-devel mailing list
postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
-----------------------------------------
The substance of this message, including any attachments, may be
confidential, legally privileged and/or exempt from disclosure
pursuant to Massachusetts law. It is intended
solely for the addressee. If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.