[postgis-devel] Rebranding proposal for SVN HEAD

[Mark Cave-Ayland]

Obe, Regina wrote:

> Actually I like that idea better of just having one .sql file to run.  I
> guess I wanted to separate the function definition  from the metadata
> comments - since it would be conceivably separate people working on each
> and/or if we are generating the meta data comments directly from the
> docs it would seem harder to upgrade if those comments are intermingled
> with the function definitions.
> 
> So would something like
> 
> postgis_core.sql.in , postgis_comments.sql.in -> postgis.sql
> 
> be doable?

Yes, that would be fine if we decide to go that route. There already 
exists code within the build process to do pre-processing on the various 
.sql files, so I don't see that adding an extra step would be too much 
of an issue.


ATB,

Mark.

-- 
Mark Cave-Ayland
Sirius Corporation - The Open Source Experts
http://www.siriusit.co.uk
T: +44 870 608 0063