[postgis-devel] WKT and Wikipedia

Paul Ramsey pramsey at cleverelephant.ca
Fri Jun 27 14:53:06 PDT 2008


No account needed to edit, just edit.
No, I don't think we should reference anything that's not actually an
improvement on what we provide ourselves.
P.

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Kevin Neufeld <kneufeld at refractions.net> wrote:
> I just came across this page:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Well-known_text
>
> I think this page is incorrect, misleading, and contains typos.  It is my
> understanding that the OGC specs on WKT does *not* include 3D and 4D
> definitions.  It is a PostGIS extension to use Z, M, or ZM. Or am I off on
> this?
> (http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=829) (section 3.2.5.2)
>
> I don't have an account to correct this.  Does any here have one?  Do we
> care?
>
> Should the new PostGIS docs reference such pages, or point to only the OGC
> specs?
>
> -- Kevin
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>



More information about the postgis-devel mailing list