[postgis-devel] 8.4+1.3

[Paul Ramsey]

Right, I must have been testing the makefile after you committed
because it worked fine ("what's Mark talking about, it works great!")
;)

p.

On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Mark Cave-Ayland
<mark.cave-ayland at siriusit.co.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 10:03 -0800, Paul Ramsey wrote:
>> Mark,
>>
>> I looked over the patch in
>> http://postgis.refractions.net/pipermail/postgis-commits/2008-August/000413.html
>> and the *recheck value seems to never get used. So is the main thrust
>> of the 8.4 compatibility just getting the opclass defns to work, by
>> dropping the 'recheck' from the SQL?
>>
>> P.
>
> Yeah. It is now the job of the index API to determine whether the index
> scan is lossy, rather than hard-coding it inside the opclass.
>
> Incidentally the sed fix I committed earlier should also strip off the
> non-numeric part of "pg_config --version", so with this done "make
> check" should work on PG 8.4.
>
>
> ATB,
>
> Mark.
>
> --
> Mark Cave-Ayland
> Sirius Corporation - The Open Source Experts
> http://www.siriusit.co.uk
> T: +44 870 608 0063
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> postgis-devel mailing list
> postgis-devel at postgis.refractions.net
> http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
>